Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (20)
- Buildings
(100)
- Commercial (5)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (1)
- Education, science & art buildings (3)
- Health care (1)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (2)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- LPS buildings (4)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (1)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (25)
- Stadiums (1)
- Storage buildings (3)
- Tall buildings (5)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Buried pipes & culverts (2)
- Car parks (9)
- Flats & apartments (12)
- Houses (6)
- Masts & towers (3)
- Railways (6)
- Retaining structures (11)
- Roads (5)
- Sewers (2)
- Temporary structures (4)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (6)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (8)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (83)
- Demolition project (8)
- Excavation (1)
- Extension project (3)
- Fire safety assessment (1)
- Groundworks project (1)
- New build (61)
- Refurbishment (4)
- Remediation project (6)
- Repair project (3)
- Strengthening project (4)
- Structural assessment (10)
- Underpinning project (1)
Construction period
Elements & systems
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (1)
- Basements (4)
- Beams (31)
- Bracing (3)
- Canopies (1)
- Ceilings (3)
- Cladding (2)
- Columns (23)
- Fasteners & connections (30)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (15)
- Insulation (2)
- Light gauge steel framing (1)
- Lintels (1)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (6)
- Roofs (10)
- Signs (2)
- Slabs (49)
- Tendons (1)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (30)
- Wall ties (1)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (3)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (5)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (9)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 15 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (7)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (90)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS Newsletter (57)
- CROSS Safety Alert (3)
- CROSS Safety Report (163)
- CROSS Theme Page (1)
- News [sub-heading only] (13)
- Third party article (1)
- Third party content (1)
CROSS regions
Structural safety of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) planks
A Theme Page to raise awareness of and encourage knowledge sharing on the structural safety of RAAC planks.
CROSS Theme Page
Region: CROSS-UK, CROSS-AUS, CROSS-US
RAAC assessment undertaken by persons not suitably experienced
A reinforced aerated autoclaved concrete (RAAC) assessment was carried out by persons who did not appear to have appropriate experience, potentially putting building users at risk of harm.
21 August 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1224
Region: CROSS-UK
Concern about rebending starter bars
This report concerns the bending and rebending of starter bars on site during the construction of a multi storey tower. The reporter considered that such a practice could compromise the structure under extreme load conditions.
24 May 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1164
Region: CROSS-UK
Accidental partial demolition of a beam
During a site visit, the permanent works design engineer noticed that hydro-demolition of the end of a floor supporting beam had taken place out of sequence. This introduced a pattern of bending moments and shear forces that were not considered in the original design.
6 April 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 855
Region: CROSS-UK
Cantilever bridge parapet falsework failure
A reporter has experienced the failure of cantilever parapet falsework twice, for different reasons, using two different products during bridge construction.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1159
Region: CROSS-UK
Further example of incorrect finite element modelling
Concerns in respect of the sufficiency of finite element modelling of masonry walls as part of a reinforced concrete framed building.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1145
Region: CROSS-UK
Corrosion concerns on a pedestrian bridge
A reporter is concerned about a pedestrian bridge that may have reduced load capacity due to corrosion at the root of cantilever supports.
17 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1161
Region: CROSS-UK
Temporary instability of columns
Concerns were raised by a reporter on the temporary stability of concrete columns during construction.
2 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 872
Region: CROSS-UK
Incorrect lifting system used for precast concrete stair elements
A reporter was asked to inspect a precast concrete stair unit which was exhibiting cracking around the lifting anchor locations after being de-moulded.
13 December 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 883
Region: CROSS-UK
Concern over concrete test methods used on site
A reporter is concerned about the test method a contractor uses to justify the strength of concrete placed on site.
13 December 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 840
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.