CROSS Safety Report
Failure of supposedly grade 10.9 bolts
This report is over 2 years old
Overview
There was a high potential for collapse when supposedly grade 10.9 high strength holding bolts failed on a crane base.
Sixteen bolts, which had been pre-tensioned in the standard way, all failed within four days.
Key Learning Outcomes
For construction professionals:
-
Consider introducing a quality control procedure on site for the inspection of safety critical elements being delivered to ensure they are of the required quality
-
It is good practice to obtain certification to ensure that all components are sourced only from suppliers who can guarantee compliance with specification
-
The quality of supply is important to avoid variation in quality
-
There is always the possibility of counterfeit components and this was the subject of a Standing Committee on Structural Safety (SCOSS) alert: Anomalous documentation for proprietary products
Full Report
Find out more about the Full Report
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others. If you would like to know more, please visit the reporting to CROSS-AUS page.
A report describes an incident where there was a high potential for collapse when supposedly grade 10.9 high strength holding bolts failed on a crane base. Sixteen bolts, which had been pre-tensioned in the standard way, all failed within four days.
This was found to be a brittle failure and because the bolts were pre-stressed, they failed in a manner which released energy, resulting in the bolt heads being ejected up to 4m above the lifting frame.
It is believed the failure was due to delayed hydrogen embrittlement which can be caused in the manufacturing process. This type of failure would be expected to occur within a few days of tensioning bolts as was seen in this case. The investigation is ongoing, and no-one was injured. The reporter says that in future, within their organisation:
-
Bolts of Grade 10.9 or higher to be approved by technically competent person(s) prior to use
-
Hardness and tensile tests to be used as a minimum to verify the metallurgy of all Grade 10.9 bolts
-
Permits to include the need for technical sign off
-
All using this type of bolt to be briefed on this incident
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
Feedback
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
An Expert Panel comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-AUS Expert Panel page.
This is another report about problems with fixings which is a frequent topic for CROSS. Presumably, the bolts were delivered with the correct certification/ markings, which is why they were installed without any questions? In general, but particularly for safety critical components, inspection and test plans should be developed prior to construction:
There is always the possibility of counterfeit components and this was the subject of a Standing Committee on Structural Safety (SCOSS) alert: Anomalous documentation for proprietary products published in 2013.
In the UK organisations such as Highways England use only approved suppliers to avoid installing counterfeit components. For a company to be listed on the Schedule of Suppliers, it must be accredited by UKAS.
In the USA there are programs directed towards detecting counterfeit components including bolts and below is a list of General Indications: