Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Theme pages
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (42)
- CROSS Newsletter (24)
- CROSS Safety Alert (4)
- CROSS Safety Report (61)
- CROSS Topic Paper (2)
- News [sub-heading only] (12)
CROSS regions
Building regulations checking
A reporter’s firm has been carrying out building regulations checks for 25 years, but it is only in the last six or seven years (say 2000-2006) that concerns have arisen, some of which are described below.
1 July 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 33
Region: CROSS-UK
Design of timber structures
An approximate design led to a timber roof deflecting considerably.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 17
Region: CROSS-UK
Responsibility for change
The inadequate substitution of lintels led to them buckling, and the surrounding masonry cracking.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 50
Region: CROSS-UK
Building regulations submissions
This report has been written on behalf of a group of senior local government structural engineers who refer to previous CROSS newsletters and in particular the reports relating to the poor quality of building regulation submissions and lack of checking resources.
1 July 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 65
Region: CROSS-UK
Design of head track in cold formed steel framing
The reporter noticed that the in-house structural engineer for the steel frame company had not taken account of all the loads in the design of the head track.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 39
Region: CROSS-UK
Local authority checking
A reporter feels that many small consulting engineering companies rely on local authority building control departments to check their work in lieu of proper in-house quality control.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 41
Region: CROSS-UK
This one will bring the house down
This is the text of a lecture given at ICE in 2009 on the potential impact of systemic failure, within a company, and more broadly within industries, including the construction industry.
1 April 2009
CROSS Topic Paper
Region: CROSS-UK
Grades of steelwork
A reporter says that engineers seem reluctant to specify the grade of steel. Even when prompted, some fail to request anything other than just S275 – failing to mention JR, J0, or other grades.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 43
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns over structural design submissions
Concern was expressed about the standard of structural design submissions presented to local authorities.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 14
Region: CROSS-UK
Local authority resources to check structural calculations
An aspect of local authority work that caused concern to a reporter was the lack of internal resources to check calculations.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 15
Region: CROSS-UK