Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Products
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (6)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (19)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (1)
- Extension project (3)
- Groundworks project (1)
- New build (6)
- Refurbishment (4)
- Remediation project (1)
- Repair project (2)
- Structural assessment (2)
Method of construction
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 8 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (19)
- CROSS Newsletter (15)
- CROSS Safety Report (32)
- CROSS Topic Paper (1)
- News [sub-heading only] (4)
CROSS regions
'Design' for alterations to a dwelling carried out by an unsuitable person
A reporter was called upon to review a design for the removal of a loadbearing wall during the refurbishment of a residence. A builder was already on site but had stopped work since they considered the engineering design to be unsatisfactory and the structural designer was not responding to their queries. The reporter found that the structural design being followed was far from competent.
21 August 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1236
Region: CROSS-UK
Cladding subcontractor change of connection strategy led to failure
As part of their final design submission, a cladding subcontractor changed the connection strategy for their cladding system. The project structural engineer did not identify the design change and the cladding loading resulted in excessive deflection and some twisting of the primary perimeter steel.
21 August 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1189
Region: CROSS-UK
Private Building Control data protection use
A reporter needed details of a domestic extension from a local authority who said that an application had been made for the original work by a private company, but under the Data Protection Act they could not release any drawings or documentation.
6 April 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 825
Region: CROSS-UK
The selection of principal designer and principal contractor
A reporter is concerned that some organisations that they would normally expect to be appointed as principal designer or principal contractor under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 are avoiding such appointments.
17 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1150
Region: CROSS-UK
Unsafe design of retrofit cantilever balconies
A structural assessment of a number of new balconies being added to an existing building revealed critical concerns in respect of fixings back into the existing brickwork.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1128
Region: CROSS-UK
Overloading of existing steelwork frame
Inadequate structural investigations and design of alteration works leads to damage to multi-storey flats.
10 March 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1033
Region: CROSS-UK
Dangerous building work on domestic project
Temporary propping fails during works to a semi-detached property putting the whole building at risk of collapse.
10 March 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1062
Region: CROSS-UK
Safety concern for outdoor video screens
This report is to raise concerns about the suitability of video screen support systems being used outdoors for public displays.
14 October 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 979
Region: CROSS-UK
Emergency motorway lane closure during concrete repairs
This report highlights how confusion during concrete repair works led to an unplanned emergency lane closure of a bridge carrying a motorway.
1 July 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 926
Region: CROSS-UK
Consequences of low professional fees
An engineer believes that despite public concerns about workmanship issues on site, low professional fees mean that engineers are not able to adequately check the work on site.
1 July 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 905
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.