CROSS Safety Report
Checking reinforcement before concrete pours
This report is over 2 years old
Overview
A reporter shares their concerns about incorrect rebar positioning on site prior to concrete being poured.
Key Learning Outcomes
For construction professionals:
-
Reinforcement should be installed as per the detailed drawings. If constraints arise on site with placing reinforcement, the design engineer should be consulted prior to any alterations being made.
-
Steel fixing work should be undertaken by experienced and competent workers
-
Consider introducing a quality assurance process that covers the checking and inspection of installed reinforcement
For civil and structural design engineers:
- If you are unable to attend site, consider asking the contractor for site photos of the reinforcement installation prior to concrete being poured
- Guidance on good detailing is given in the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) Standard method of detailing structural concrete (Fourth edition)
Full Report
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter from a consulting firm has concerns about rebar being positioned on site prior to concrete being poured. As part of their services, they insist on visiting the site to view and comment on the installed reinforcement bars prior to concrete being cast. These range from reinforced concrete (RC) ground beams on smaller projects, up to multi-storey RC framed buildings.
Typical reinforcement issues found on site
They are aware that this is not standard practice with most other projects as the project structural engineer will not usually be requested to visit site to comment on installed reinforcement.
Typically, there are significant issues with:
-
Reinforcement lap lengths
-
Cover to reinforcement
-
Shear reinforcement incorrectly installed and spaced
-
Spare or leftover bars, which should be impossible as every scheduled bar is needed
-
Incorrect spacing and layer directions (e.g. B1/B2 and T1/T2 are in the wrong directions)
Generally, the response from the contractor on site is that building control have said it is fine and passed it.
Who is inspecting reinforcement placement on site?
What happens on all other projects that the structural engineer does not insist on visiting the site to comment on reinforcement? The reporter has little faith that the main contractor or the building control inspectors, neither of which are typically structural engineers, will be picking up these issues.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
Feedback
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
Independent checking, ideally by the original designer, is the most straightforward way to check quality and accuracy of installation. However, there are also benefits in contractor detailing, where the detailing can be tailored to the contractor’s construction sequencing and thus potentially improving economy and site safety.
There are also contractual systems where the designer is novated to the main contractor. Both of these approaches mean that the designer is not truly independent of the contractor. Conversely, there are main contractors who will employ structural engineers to check the reinforcement fixed by their subcontractors and who are independent of those fixing the reinforcement.
Generally, two safety issues stand out from this report:
No changes should be made unless sanctioned by the designer
The observations reported are part of an unwelcome trend whereby designers fail to verify by inspection that what is being built is what they thought was being built
The observations reported are part of an unwelcome trend whereby designers fail to verify by inspection that what is being built is what they thought was being built
The role of building control officers
Building control officers can only be ‘experts’ in building control, and whilst some may be structural engineers, it is not their primary role. They should not be relied upon to ensure contractor’s quality of work. Just because they have passed it, does not absolve the contractor or designer of their responsibilities.
Typical reinforcement issues
It is essential that steel fixing work is undertaken by trained and knowledgeable workers under suitable supervision. Competent site work is a significant factor in ensuring the long-term integrity of the reinforced concrete (RC) for its intended design life.
For instance, the following issues will often manifest themselves not on striking the formwork, but many years down the line:
A lack of cover or debris being present
Too much cover to reinforcement
Inadequate vibration compaction
Inadequate ties of rebar resulting in movement during vibration
Misplaced and missing rebar
Guidance on good reinforcement detailing
In addition to poor quality control, there may be other causes for changes on site. Rebar detailing is a skill and incorrect detailing can mean bars are impossible to position accurately, or even fit in. Cases are known of contractors omitting bars where fit is impossible or where rebar density is so high that concreting is impossible.
Guidance on good detailing is given in the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) Standard method of detailing structural concrete (Fourth edition).
A further issue on site is the need to check that the concrete mix supplied, especially when there are specialist mixes, comply with the specification.