Skip to main content

CROSS Safety Report

Collapse of a hollow core unit

Report ID: 258 Published: 1 October 2012 Region: CROSS-UK

This report is over 2 years old

Please be aware that it might contain information that is no longer up to date. We keep all reports available for historic reference and as learning aids.

Overview

This refers to the collapse of one modest span precast hollow core concrete unit and the excessive deflection of others on a building which was under construction.

Key Learning Outcomes

For precast manufacturers and suppliers:

  • Quality assurance and competent supervision in the precast yard can help to ensure that precast elements are constructed in accordance with the design

Full Report

Find out more about the Full Report

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others. If you would like to know more, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.

This refers to the collapse of one modest span precast hollow core concrete unit and the excessive deflection of others on a building which was under construction. The collapse occurred when the only load was self-weight and fortunately the falling debris missed workers below and there were no injuries. The units, which contained embedded polystyrene, were composed of bottom pre-stressed panels with a top layer of concrete placed in the works a few hours later.

The usual method of manufacture, says the reporter, would be to use normal concrete, with the two pours being separated by a suitable interval and vibrated with a poker to give interlock between the bottom slab and the connecting ribs from the top sections. In this case self-compacting concrete was used with no vibration between the bottom and top pours.

The result was an almost smooth surface at the horizontal joints and it was here that delamination occurred on site as a 50mm thick pre-stressed slab tried to support over 200mm of dead weight from the top part of the sandwich. Other panels were removed from site because of defects unrelated to the delamination such as cracking and excessive camber or no camber. Some were removed which showed signs of shear failure cracking.

Expert Panel Comments

Find out more about the Expert Panels

Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.

This is similar to report 342 (GRP panels as permanent shuttering) in that supplied components did not meet expectations. Proper quality control is vital at all stages and here there seems to have been a lack of appreciation of the need to provide a shear key between the two concrete elements.

Quality assurance is not just a form-filling exercise and to be successful depends upon having adequately trained and vigilant supervisors throughout the process. Health and Safety Executive  files contain many cases where collapses of shuttering under load have led to deaths and serious injuries.

Share your knowledge

Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.