CROSS Safety Report
Computer aided design
This report is over 2 years old
Overview
Concerns are raises after it was discovered that the steel design element of a software package did not automatically allow for nominal moments in the design of columns for simple structures.
Key Learning Outcomes
For civil and structural design engineers:
-
It is good practice to check and validate all design outputs from proprietary design software
-
If you are concerned with any of the output’s, consider raising this with the software technical support team and seeking clarification
Full Report
Find out more about the Full Report
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others. If you would like to know more, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
There has been a report that the steel design element of a software package does not automatically allow for nominal moments in the design of columns for simple structures.
Share your knowledge
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
Feedback
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
This is an example of an issue previously raised by CROSS and others about the problems of validating the software model and verifying the output.
The advice is to check results, possibly using more than one software package, and check that the computer aided design is to the relevant codes of practice. Designers must remember that it is they, not software suppliers, who are responsible for design.