CROSS Safety Report
Contractor installs incorrect steel grade
This report is over 2 years old
A reporter came across an issue where the fabricator had used cold formed S235 commodity steel SHS rather than the specified hot formed S275 structural steel SHS.
Key Learning Outcomes
For construction professionals:
Substitution of construction elements should not be made without verification from the design engineer
Consider introducing a quality assurance process that covers the correct use of products, components, and materials on site
For civil and structural design engineers:
Share your knowledge of the behaviour of products, components and materials and routinely raise the risks associated with substitutions to contractors and the wider project team
If you are concerned that the incorrect material may have been installed on site, consider asking the contractor for the material certificates to confirm what has been installed
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter came across an issue where the fabricator had used cold formed S235 commodity steel SHS rather than the specified hot formed S275 structural steel SHS. The change was discovered during a review of material certificates, after the job was finished.
The project, in a football stadium, was for gantries to hold sound and lighting equipment (with access for technicians) slung beneath the stadium roof directly over the public seating. Apparently, the fabricator had difficulty getting the S275 steel and the steel stockholder told him the S235 was easily available and an acceptable alternative.
The reporter did not agree, and the gantries had to be replaced using the correct grade of steel. An expensive lesson for the contractor but sadly all too common says the reporter.
The reporter did not agree, and the gantries had to be replaced using the correct grade of steel. An expensive lesson for the contractor but sadly all too common says the reporter
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
It is not possible to distinguish different grades of steel simply by looking at them. Likewise, it is not possible to distinguish different grades of concrete just by looking at the cast material. To overcome this, it is important to operate a proper quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) system to assure that what is built is what it is intended would be built. There needs to be detailed specifications of workmanship and materials, and inspection and test plans to provide quality control to meet those specified requirements.
This report also has echoes of a comment made for report 736 about the vital importance of change control: never change anything unless the designer has agreed. This is a Golden Rule in temporary works management (BS5975 refers), where the Temporary Works Coordinator has a stated duty to ensure that design intent equals constructed manifestation.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.