CROSS Safety Report
Deterioration of walkable sandwich panel ceilings
This report is over 2 years old
A reporter has raised concern about a complex and potentially far-reaching concern about unseen progressive deterioration in sandwich ceiling panels that have mineral wool lamella cores.
Key Learning Outcomes
For building owners:
Be aware that there may be existing buildings that incorporate degraded panels showing no outward signs of damage but that are used as walkways
Protecting new panels can be achieved by use of spreader boards and edge protection
For contractors and firefighters and :
Be aware of the risk that designated roof walkways may have routes over deteriorated ceiling panels that may collapse
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter has written about a complex and potentially far-reaching concern about unseen progressive deterioration in sandwich ceiling panels that have mineral wool lamella cores.
They say that since the Sun Valley incident (Hereford UK 1993), in which two firemen lost their lives, mineral wool cores have been generally specified for such ceilings. This is because of their superior performance in fire. Countless square metres of such ceilings are believed to be in use.
Ceiling collapse resulting in serious injury
The reporter goes on to say that in a more recent incident, a team of four men working in the roof space above a food processing plant fell through the ceiling. It collapsed under their weight and the weight of the load that they were carrying. One of the men was seriously injured.
The ceiling was constructed of 100mm deep metal-faced sandwich panels with a core of mineral wool lamellas. The span of the panels involved was less than 2m. The safe span under BS 6399-1 loadings, should have been almost 6m.
Progressive degradation of panel cores
The cause of this has been identified as progressive degradation of the mineral wool lamellas under repeated heel impacts. This is from people walking on the ceiling. Mineral wool lamellas have near-vertical fibres of relatively brittle mineral wool. These tend to fracture as rather rigid but brittle struts locally under heel impact.
As feet are never placed in exactly the same place twice, each time someone walks on the ceiling, some more fractures take place. In due course, regions of the upper face of the panel become completely delaminated and the panel loses its strength.
The panels which collapsed were on an access route which was used for routine maintenance of plant in the ceiling void. Such panels are generally classed as being suitable for ‘occasional access’, precisely the circumstances which prevailed in the case in question.
They had been in use for approximately five years. Subsequent investigation showed that adjacent panels on this access route were in a state of incipient delamination as a result of foot traffic.
Research into the durability of sandwich panels
A European research contract under the acronym ‘ASP AN’ investigated the durability of sandwich panels during the period 2002 to 2004. Panels included a range of core materials including mineral wool lamellas and several different rigid plastic foams.
Subjecting the panels to repeated walking gave significant results. The mineral wool had locally lost its adhesion over an area measuring 100mm x 100mm after about 500 heel impacts whereas other core materials were relatively undamaged after up to 2,400 impacts.
Subjecting the panels to repeated walking gave significant results. The mineral wool had locally lost its adhesion over an area measuring 100mm x 100mm after about 500 heel impacts whereas other core materials were relatively undamaged after up to 2,400 impacts
Protection of panels from localised loads
There are two aspects to the resulting problem. Protecting new construction is relatively simple using, for example, spreader boards and edge protection. The industry needs to be vigilant in this respect.
It is well known that a great deal of damage can be done to ceilings if they are not protected while plant and equipment is installed.
The more significant problem concerns the ceilings in service which may be in varying states of degradation which is unseen and progressive. According to the reporter, no non-destructive test is known whereby the condition of a ceiling can be established.
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
Composite proprietary panels are widely used and they can be required to carry live loads. Most will be entirely satisfactory but caution should be exercised. When specifying products, designers should consider the obligation to avoid hazards (so far as is reasonably practicable), before trying to control the resultant risks. Hence, the need to ask if these products should be used in situations where damage during operations could be critical?
When specifying products, designers should consider the obligation to avoid hazards (so far as is reasonably practicable), before trying to control the resultant risks
Under CDM Regulations, the operation and maintenance manuals might be expected to highlight dangers from walking on panels. This might not apply to alteration work where a contractor is involved who, despite the requirements of the regulations, does not have any knowledge of the problems that could exist.
Concern about panels in existing building stock
The main issue, as pointed out by the reporter, is the stock of existing buildings that may incorporate degraded panels showing no outward signs of damage but that are used as walkways. CROSS thanks the reporter for bringing this matter to their attention and it will be considered further.
Advisors, contractors and facilities managers should be aware of the potential problems. In the situation where there could be latent damage, and in the absence of any other information, panels should be regarded as potentially unsafe for additional loading.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.