CROSS Safety Report
Failure of cast-in lifting anchor on precast twin-wall
This report is over 2 years old
A precast reinforced concrete twin-wall panel was being lifted when one of the cast-in lifting anchors suffered a brittle failure.
Key Learning Outcomes
For precast manufacturers and suppliers:
Quality assurance and competent supervision in the precast yard can help to ensure that precast elements are constructed in accordance with the design
Consider introducing a quality control procedure for the inspection of safety critical connections such as cast-in lifting anchors
A pre-pour and post-pour inspection of lifting anchors can help to identify if they have moved or become dislodged during the pouring process
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A precast reinforced concrete twin-wall panel was lifted approximately 500mm from the tilting frame when one of the designed cast-in lifting anchors suffered a brittle failure (Figure 1). This resulted in the panel swinging from the remaining lifting anchor causing minor damage to the panel, according to the reporter.
The remaining lifting anchor held allowing the panel to be placed safely back on the tilting frame. Due to the planning, control and safe lifting practices adopted for this operation, there were no injuries as a result of this component failure.
Due to the planning, control and safe lifting practices adopted for this operation, there were no injuries as a result of this component failure
Identifying the root cause
In order to identify the root cause, a portion of the failed lifting anchor along with an unused proprietary lifting anchor supplied by the manufacturer were sent to a laboratory for examination. It was concluded that the failed lifting anchor was manufactured from rebar of the same diameter as the specified product.
However, it had been bent to a diameter significantly less than the minimum allowable diameter, as shown in Figure 2. Additionally, the pattern of ribs on the rebar used for the failed lifting anchor indicated that it was of a different type to that used in the proprietary lifting anchors.
Quality control failure
The reporter states that the cause of the significant near miss was a quality control failure during the manufacturing process. The laboratory identified in their report how a visual inspection could identify proprietary and non-proprietary lifting anchors. The reporter now incorporates this visual inspection into all subsequent lifting operations.
According to the reporter, it is essential that all parties involved in the procurement of precast items carry out the necessary checks. This can help ensure that all off-site manufacturing is carried out in accordance with an agreed inspection and test regime such that bespoke items of precast concrete are manufactured strictly in accordance with the design and specification.
The reporter states that cast-in items including lifting anchors should be itemised on the pre-pour and post-pour checklist and inspections and tests should be carried out and recorded by an independent person at planned stages during production and before release for delivery.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
There are no Expert Panel comments on this report. The Expert Panels are only asked to comment on selected reports. These are normally reports where there is an opportunity for them to help you understand what can be learned from the report.