CROSS Safety Report
Light gauge steel fabrication
This report is over 2 years old
Referring to Report AUS-4, Light steel truss issues, this reporter has concerns about the low ductility of the high tensile steel, in particular with respect to connection design and capacity.
Close adherence to industry guidelines and standards that have been verified by testing should be followed, and any deviation from this guidance should be verified by appropriate testing.
Key Learning Outcomes
For structural and civil engineers:
Be aware of effects of dynamic, cyclic, or fluctuating loads (e.g., wind loads) on low ductility thin gauge high tensile steel used in truss construction
Consider the increased likelihood of fatigue as a possible failure mechanism when using thin gauge high tensile steel
Pay attention to increased risk of lack of warning of failure at connections in trusses made using thin gauge high tensile steel
Be aware that, in fire conditions, thin gauge high tensile steel has very different behaviour to mild steel
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter refers to Report AUS-4 published in CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 of Feb 2020 entitled Light steel truss issues. The reporter, who has many years’ experience working with light gauge steel as a designer, has been looking into thin gauge high tensile steel, as used in the prefabrication industry to manufacture trusses. In addition to the points raised in the article, the reporter also has concern about the low ductility of the high tensile steel, with respect to connection design and capacity.
Low ductility and increased likelihood of fracture at joints
The reporter's experience is that it is not uncommon for these steels to have an elongation less than 2%, and for certain gauges AS1397 does not specify a minimum elongation. Thus, fracture of the joints is a serious concern, particularly as most testing would only consider short term loading scenarios. The reporter agrees with the concerns around the points raised in Report AUS-4, and that these members are likely to fail at a very localised area around the heel if not designed accordingly.
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
This report is a good example of the need for designers to understand the properties of the materials they are dealing with and the environment in which they will be used. When materials with low ductility, such as thin gauge high tensile steel, are being used there will be less warning of failure as the ultimate load is approached and with cyclic or fluctuating loads such as wind loading, fatigue failure becomes a critical issue especially at connections.
Industry guidelines and standards
Thus it is important that industry guidelines and standards that have been verified by testing are closely adhered to and any departure from these either in the material being used or the loading being applied should be verified by further testing that replicates the actual situation. It is our understanding that some high strength light gauge steel truss systems have been tested under cyclic loading representative of wind loading from tropical cyclones and reference should be made to the specialist suppliers of these systems or to the Cyclone Testing Station for further advice in this area.
Behaviour in fire conditions
Behaviour in fire is also an important consideration as thin gauge high tensile steel exhibits very different behaviour than mild steel sections and if it is to be used in a fire rated assembly, there should be test evidence available to allow the engineer, and the regulatory authorities, to assess its suitability.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.