CROSS Safety Report
No responsibility for damaged footbridge
This report is over 2 years old
A reporter describes how they tried to raise concerns over a damaged footbridge but could not determine ownership.
The footbridge was in a public car park and one beam had the centre of its web missing for the last metre, and at least half of its flange missing for the middle 3m of the span.
Key Learning Outcomes
For all built environment professionals:
If you notice a potential safety issue not during the course of your work, consider reporting it to the owner or tenant
If the owner is not known, then the appropriate regulator could be informed
Local authorities also have powers to take action if there is a potential imminent risk to the public
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A small footbridge in a public car park has the centre of the web missing for the last metre on one beam, and at least half of flange missing for the middle 3m of the span. This was reported to the local authority council who declined responsibility and passed the problem to the county authority as this is a bridge. In turn the county said that it was not their problem and suggested phoning the owner of an adjacent superstore who did not respond. Who is responsible if no owner can be identified?
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
This and report 704 are very similar. It is heartening to see that in both cases, someone not only raised the issue but had the determination to carry it through. It does though seem wrong that it is left to third party responsible engineers to act in such cases.
Ownership can be complicated; however local authorities have powers to take action if there is a potential imminent risk to the public. They can take such action as necessary to remove the risk and to charge the owner for the costs when ownership is determined. Powers are usually delegated to the local authority building control office.
It should be noted, however that the responsibility for maintaining a safe structure always rests with the owner.