Skip to main content

CROSS Safety Report

Questionable tension bracing arrangement

Report ID: 727 Published: 1 July 2018 Region: CROSS-UK

This report is over 2 years old

Please be aware that it might contain information that is no longer up to date. We keep all reports available for historic reference and as learning aids.

Overview

A reporter is concerned about the arrangement of diagonal tension bracing in one bay of a building.

Key Learning Outcomes

For construction professionals:

  • If structural modifications are required due to lack of fit issues on site seek approval from the design team prior to making the alterations

For all built environment professionals:

  • If you notice a potential safety issue not during the course of your work, consider reporting it to the owner or tenant

  • If the owner is not known, then the appropriate regulator could be informed

Full Report

Find out more about the Full Report

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others. If you would like to know more, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.

A reporter is concerned about the arrangement of diagonal tension bracing in one bay of a building. The connection is formed of four stainless steel bars connected by what looks to be a circular plate. The bars are out of alignment due to incorrect measurement or poor fabrication. To make the connection fit, the ends of the bars have been ground down and the plate skewed resulting in an eccentric loading arrangement.

In the case of a brace under tension, the plate will rotate about its centroid due to the eccentricity of the tension force. The resulting rotation will force the opposing bars into compression increasing the likelihood of the bars buckling - all the more critical if the length of the bars is not as designed.

Expert Panel Comments

Find out more about the Expert Panels

Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.

Another case of a third party picking up on a potential fault. The arrangement of the members is not unusual, but it seems to be a case of the installation not matching the design, and possibly the assumptions in design being breached. No connection is perfect in alignment, but a good robust design will cater for some deviations.

If the members have needed to be altered on site to make them fit, that should have been the trigger to ensure the design was still valid. Any steel structure is only as good, or as safe, as the integrity of its connections. Hence the principal designer must be assured that the design intent overall has been correctly translated into reality.

If the members have needed to be altered on site to make them fit, that should have been the trigger to ensure the design was still valid

However, has the reporter raised this with the building owner? There is no legal duty to do so but as a matter of good ethical practice an engineer who notices a potential safety issue would advise the owner, or tenant of their concern. If it is not known who this is, then the local authority could be informed. Where there might be an immediate and severe risk, then CROSS may be able to advise on a course of action.

Share your knowledge

Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.