CROSS Safety Report
Structural steel - reinforced concrete interface
This report is over 2 years old
A reporter describes how the substructure of a building was constructed out of position to the extent that the steel frame could not be erected to tolerance and could not be connected to the holding down bolts.
Key Learning Outcomes
For clients and construction professionals:
The need for collaboration over boundaries should be recognised where multiple parties are involved
The transfer and coordination of relevant information is important to overcome interface issues as demonstrated in this report
Quality control and competent supervision on site can help to ensure that the structure is built in accordance with the design
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
The reporter describes circumstances on site where organisations had different priorities. A client demanding instant progress, a main contractor with an inexperienced site manager, a steelwork contractor responsible for fabrication only and a steelwork erection subcontractor. There was a reinforced concrete substructure with conventional holding down bolts for a steel frame.
The substructure had been constructed out of position to the extent that the steel frame could not be erected to tolerance and could not be connected to the holding down bolts. The solution adopted was for the bolts to be burned off at foundation level and for the steel frame to be erected in true position without any bolts. The modification was completed by placing the burned off portions of the holding bolts complete with nuts in the base plate holes and disguising the assembly so that it looked to be normal.
The holding down bolts were required in order to sustain considerable uplift forces. Had the deception not been discovered by someone with sufficient knowledge to understand the potential implications of the loss of the anchoring forces a structural failure would have been a serious possibility and thus this incident constitutes a near miss.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.
Expert Panel Comments
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
This is an extreme case but there is evidence that concrete/steel interface problems are not uncommon. Again, specific examples are sought so that any trends can be determined and recommendations for improvements can then be made.