CROSS Safety Report
Suspended ceiling partial collapse
This report is over 2 years old
A reporter was asked to investigate a suspended ceiling, formed from a lay-in grid, that had partially collapsed in a school classroom.
In the view of the reporter, issues with workmanship caused this failure but contributory causes were both the lack of a clear specification and effective supervision of the work.
Key Learning Outcomes
For construction professionals:
Consider introducing a quality assurance process that covers the inspection of fixings for ceiling systems
If a specification is not clear, consider raising any concerns with the supplier or the design engineer
For civil and structural design engineers:
Give attention to the design of ceilings and the safety-critical aspects of their fixings and anchors
Check contractor’s design portion (CDPs) listed in the contract to ensure there is clarity about design responsibility and what liaison is required
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter was asked to investigate the partial collapse of a suspended ceiling formed from a lay-in grid with medium weight acoustic tiles in a school classroom. Fortunately, although the room was in use, nobody was harmed.
Fixture of suspended ceiling
The building and ceiling were less than 10 years old. The ceiling was fixed to the underside of a timber joisted roof by wire hangers. The underside of the roof had a layer of plasterboard attached for airtightness such that the joists were not visible.
For supporting the suspended ceiling, eye bolts were screwed into some joists. In other locations, short lengths of inverted ceiling grid were used to bridge between joists, and these were fixed back to the timber joists with two or three 32mm long drywall screws at each end. The effective embedment of the screws into the joists was approximately 10mm having passed through the inverted grid and the plasterboard.
Progressive failure of fixings
The failure of the ceiling was initiated at a location where the screws to fix the inverted grid to the joists had missed the joist and were only screwed into plasterboard at one end of the inverted grid. The failure progressed along two other fixing points for the inverted grid and stopped where the suspended ceiling was supported by an eye bolt screwed into a joist.
Does a lack of information lead to poor workmanship?
The specification did not directly state how the suspended ceiling was to be fixed to the roof. However it did refer the installer to BS8290-3 (already superseded at the time - now replaced by BS EN 13964:2014 Suspended ceilings - Requirements and test methods), which did require a minimum screw embedment of 38mm into the underside of a joist, says the reporter.
In the view of the reporter, errors in workmanship caused this failure but contributory causes were both the lack of a clear specification and effective supervision of the work.
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
Failures of ceilings are a recurring problem. In addition to the example in this report, there was a recent failure of a ceiling at a theatre in London and another collapse at a shopping centre in Paisley. CROSS has received many ceiling collapses reports. You can search for safety information on ceilings on the CROSS website.
Guidance on the design of ceilings and their fixings
In 2015, the Best practice guide - selection and installation of top fixings for suspended ceilings was developed by the Finishes and Interiors Sector (FIS), the Construction Fixings Association (CFA), the Standing Committee on Structural-Safety (SCOSS) and other industry experts, as a guide to best practice on the choice, installation and testing of fixings for suspended ceilings.
The 2014 SCOSS Alert on Tension systems and post-drilled resin fixings listed further CROSS reports on ceiling failures. It also provides guidance on the design of new ceilings and for the checking of existing ceilings. A 2019 article in The Structural Engineer on the Safety of hanging systems: lessons from CROSS reports is another useful reference.
Familiar failure patterns
It appears that ceilings do not receive the level of attention, both in design and construction, that the potential consequences of failure deserve. The failure in this report follows a familiar pattern; a progressive collapse initiated by a single hanger failure, with that initial failure precipitated by connection failure.
Self-evidently, the hanger loads were uncertain and using wire hangers would not permit any meaningful control of hanger loads. A division of design responsibility and an inability to inspect also appear to be contributing factors to this failure.
A division of design responsibility and an inability to inspect also appear to be contributing factors to this failure
Designers should also remember to check contractor's design portion (CDPs) listed in the contract to ensure there is clarity about design responsibility and what liaison is required.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.