CROSS Safety Report
Toppling of precast concrete unit during lifting causes serious injury
This report is over 2 years old
During a routine lifting exercise of a precast concrete unit, the unit tipped over while a worker was unslinging the top sling points for the unit using a ladder, causing them a serious injury.
Key Learning Outcomes
For precast manufacturers and suppliers:
Lifting chains should be fully unhooked and the precast unit stable prior to lifting the chains away
It is good practice to review working practices to eliminate or reduce hazards, with a particular focus where there is human interface
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
A reporter states that during a routine lifting exercise of a L-shaped precast concrete unit, the unit tipped over while a worker was unslinging the top sling points for the unit using a ladder, causing them a serious injury. As a result of this incident, the reporter's organisation plan to eliminate reoccurrence of this incident by reviewing current working practices by eliminating or reducing the hazard. In particular the human interface element.
According to the reporter, the immediate cause was that the lifting chains were still being unhooked by the worker at the top of the unit when the machine operator lifted the chains away, causing the unit to topple with the worker still at the top.
The reporter's considerations include:
Unit shape and configuration: Can the units be designed to allow a wider base/foot, therefore be less top heavy? Can a standard size be implemented? Can the heights be limited, and extensions used (downside is introducing more lifts)?
Lifting point connection: Are there remote systems opposed to the conventional clutch arrangement? Magnetic attachment? Vacuum lifting (limited by weight/no fail-safe)? Load release/remote hook clamp is the preferred approach as it prevents the need to work at height, enabling the load to be disconnected from distance at ground level.
Weight of units: Would reducing the weight change the stability? Can the units be designed lighter, utilising alternative construction such as foam concrete?
Storage/lifting on site: Use of a storage cradle? Delivered to and left on trailer at site reducing lifts? Level storage area, what control measures? Use only cranes to lift units as opposed to excavators?
Training: Driver, banksman and design/fabrication training.
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
There are no Expert Panel comments on this report. The Expert Panels are only asked to comment on selected reports. These are normally reports where there is an opportunity for them to help you understand what can be learned from the report.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.