CROSS Safety Report
Use of proprietary element beyond stated values
This report is over 2 years old
After the construction of a 6m high lighting frame, the contractor noticed that the frame was both twisting and deflecting excessively under wind loading.
Key Learning Outcomes
For civil and structural design engineers:
Careful consideration needs to be given to dynamic effects of wind loads acting on framed structures as the torsional capacity of the frame may become critical
Find out more about the Full Report
The Full Report below has been submitted to CROSS and describes the reporter’s experience. The text has been edited for clarity and to ensure anonymity and confidentiality by removing any identifiable details. If you would like to know more about our secure reporting process or submit a report yourself, please visit the reporting to CROSS-UK page.
On an industrial site, the on-site electrical engineers required the construction of a 6m high lighting frame. For unknown reasons, the engineers specified the use of proprietary elements for the design and asked the civil engineers working in the same organisation to check a sketch done by them. The design was done statically (axial, bending moment, deflection and shear), and met the requirements of the Eurocodes.
However, there were issues with the design as the length of the members was well outside the published load tables for the elements. Accordingly, the load bearing capacities of the frame had to be calculated using the published properties and codes of practice. After the construction, the contractor noticed that the frame was both twisting and deflecting excessively under wind loading. It was discovered that the torsional capacity of the frame was critical due to the dynamic effect of the wind.
The original civil design team quickly proposed a solution of lowering the height of the lighting frame and installing some raking members from supports to arrest the movement. After a discussion, the civil team concluded that they should have questioned the design more thoroughly and gone with an off the shelf product (e.g. a lamp post or a universal beam or column).
After a discussion, the civil team concluded that they should have questioned the design more thoroughly
Expert Panel Comments
Find out more about the Expert Panels
Expert Panels comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-UK Expert Panels page.
There are no Expert Panel comments on this report. The Expert Panels are only asked to comment on selected reports. These are normally reports where there is an opportunity for them to help you understand what can be learned from the report.
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.
No feedback has yet been published for this page.