Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Building height
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Method of construction
Structural form
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Risk management
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 27 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (64)
- CROSS Newsletter (43)
- CROSS Safety Report (81)
- News [sub-heading only] (7)
CROSS regions
Steelwork splices do not match design calculations
Remedial works had to be carried out after it was found that steelwork splices on site did not match calculations which were retrospectively provided by a contractor.
29 March 2021
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 916
Region: CROSS-UK
Building regulations submissions
This report has been written on behalf of a group of senior local government structural engineers who refer to previous CROSS newsletters and in particular the reports relating to the poor quality of building regulation submissions and lack of checking resources.
1 July 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 65
Region: CROSS-UK
Wind damage to secondary elements
A period of storm force winds, with wind speeds approaching design levels, resulted in damage to secondary roofing and cladding elements.
1 July 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 42
Region: CROSS-UK
Timber truss
The reporter has been dealing with an application where the engineer involved discovered proprietary timber girder trusses with some glued joints that have come loose.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 62
Region: CROSS-UK
Scaffolds and traffic protection
A reporter is concerned about the lack of consideration shown both in British Standards and industry guidance regarding the risk of impact of vehicles with scaffolds and thereby putting at risk those working on a scaffold.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 53
Region: CROSS-UK
Incorrect use of timber joist hanger
A reporter has become aware of another collapse resulting from the incorrect use of proprietary timber joist hangers in housing construction.
1 January 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 95
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of a wall during construction
An internal corridor wall collapsed in a school under construction.
1 April 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 99
Region: CROSS-UK
Follow up to Liquid Metal Assisted Cracking (LMAC)
A recent case involving cracking around holes in large structural components was detected immediately after galvanising as a result of the team being aware of the need for post galvanising inspection.
1 July 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 105
Region: CROSS-UK
Unauthorised scaffolding
A reporter raises concerns over a temporary scaffold support that they came across that was over a public highway.
1 July 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 111
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate chimney support
The supports for a domestic chimney had been removed which left a 2.5m high chimney stack almost unsupported and in a potentially dangerous state.
1 April 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 131
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.