Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (9)
- Buildings
(87)
- Commercial (5)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (2)
- Education, science & art buildings (5)
- Health care (2)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (1)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (27)
- Stadiums (2)
- Storage buildings (4)
- Tall buildings (4)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (2)
- Transport buildings (2)
- Car parks (3)
- Flats & apartments (9)
- Houses (8)
- Masts & towers (4)
- Railways (4)
- Retaining structures (3)
- Roads (2)
- Sewers (1)
- Temporary structures (3)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (4)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (104)
- Extension project (1)
- (-) New build (119)
- Refurbishment (6)
- Remediation project (6)
- Repair project (1)
- Strengthening project (2)
- Structural assessment (2)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Arch (1)
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (3)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (30)
- Bracing (7)
- Canopies (1)
- Ceilings (1)
- Cladding (7)
- Columns (22)
- Fasteners & connections (30)
- Fire protection (5)
- Foundations (15)
- Insulation (2)
- Light gauge steel framing (4)
- Lintels (2)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (1)
- Roofs (6)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (21)
- Tendons (1)
- Trusses (1)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (19)
- Wall ties (2)
- Wind posts (1)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (4)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (4)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (7)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 61 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (70)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (4)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (58)
- CROSS Safety Report (119)
- News [sub-heading only] (18)
CROSS regions
Glazing design and horizontal barrier loading
A reporter shares problems they have encountered with barrier loading requirements on a curtain walling glazing system.
1 July 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 899
Region: CROSS-UK
Unauthorised structural alterations to accommodate drainpipes
A reporter became aware of cases where main structural steel sections were ‘butchered’ on site to accommodate drainpipes.
1 July 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 902
Region: CROSS-UK
Checking reinforcement before concrete pours
A reporter shares their concerns about incorrect rebar positioning on site prior to concrete being poured.
1 July 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 894
Region: CROSS-UK
Unconservative design of flat slab due to software modelling issues
A reporter discusses how a design/modelling problem caused an under-designed reinforced concrete (RC) slab to be constructed.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 886
Region: CROSS-UK
Propping of post-tensioned slabs during construction
A reporter raises their concerns after an infill slab strip was not poured in time which resulted in overloading of the slab below during a concrete pour.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 873
Region: CROSS-UK
Dangerous substitution of lintels on domestic projects
This report highlights the structural risk of substituting lintels during domestic projects without approval from the design engineer.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 889
Region: CROSS-UK
Missing punching shear reinforcement in concrete slabs
A reporter raises concerns of how two separate engineers observed the omission of design punching shear reinforcement prior to slab pours being undertaken on two different sites.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 906
Region: CROSS-UK
Post-tensioned slab failure during tendon stressing operations
A reporter disseminates the lessons learned after the end of a slab burst while stressing the tendons in a post-tensioned concrete slab.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 882
Region: CROSS-UK
Products installed without CE-marking due to lower cost
Another report from Germany concerns products that have been delivered and installed on a construction site without any CE marking and Declaration of Performance (DoP) at all.
1 January 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 836
Region: CROSS-UK
Contractor uses incorrect fixing bolts for masonry support angles
A correspondent noticed that proprietary masonry support angles specified to support the outer leaf of masonry had been incorrectly connected to the steel beam using carriage bolts.
1 July 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 794
Region: CROSS-UK