Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (14)
- Buildings
(90)
- Car parks (4)
- Commercial (12)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (1)
- Education, science & art buildings (9)
- Health care (2)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (3)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- LPS buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (3)
- Recreational buildings (4)
- Residential (22)
- Stadiums (2)
- Tall buildings (5)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (4)
- Transport buildings (2)
- Masts & towers (3)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (2)
- Temporary structures (2)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (7)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (2)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (49)
- Excavation (1)
- Extension project (4)
- Fire safety assessment (1)
- New build (24)
- Refurbishment (6)
- Remediation project (7)
- Repair project (1)
- Strengthening project (4)
- Structural assessment (6)
- Underpinning project (1)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (5)
- Balustrades (5)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (27)
- Bracing (3)
- Canopies (3)
- Ceilings (2)
- Cladding (16)
- Columns (16)
- Fasteners & connections (47)
- Fire protection (4)
- Foundations (7)
- Insulation (5)
- Light gauge steel framing (4)
- Padstones (3)
- Parapets (4)
- Roofs (12)
- Shear walls (2)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (9)
- Trusses (4)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (13)
- Wall ties (3)
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Business practice
Theme pages
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (3)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (3)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 23 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (55)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 1 (2)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (5)
- CROSS Newsletter (36)
- CROSS Safety Alert (2)
- CROSS Safety Report (111)
- News [sub-heading only] (9)
- Safety information from CROSS [sub-heading only] (1)
- Safety information [sub-heading only] (1)
CROSS regions
Connection fixity considerations for steel frame modelling
This report concerns the modelling of joints when using computer programs. In some cases, engineers are applying rotational releases to joints in models but subsequently designing the connections as rigid. This leaves a fundamental mismatch between analysis and design which may lead to unsafe structural connections argues a reporter.
17 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1139
Region: CROSS-UK
Steelwork splices do not match design calculations
Remedial works had to be carried out after it was found that steelwork splices on site did not match calculations which were retrospectively provided by a contractor.
29 March 2021
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 916
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate design and procurement of large steel roof structure
This report demonstrates the importance of following the correct process for project procurement, including preparing a detailed design and project specification, and certificating compliance with the relevant building codes. It also covers the potential consequences when shortcuts are taken.
30 March 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1123
Region: CROSS-AUS
Concern that the structural design of some recent buildings may not have been checked
A reporter has become increasingly concerned that some buildings may be structurally non-compliant for a number of reasons.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1120
Region: CROSS-UK
Critical welding of structural steelwork missed
The designer of a steelwork roof frame found a critical fabrication error when inspecting steelwork on site before it was erected.
21 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1126
Region: CROSS-UK
Misleading instructions for a structural component
A reporter confirms the difficulty encountered whilst endeavouring to ensure cast-in insulated connectors supporting a parapet wall and balustrade were properly fixed.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1127
Region: CROSS-UK
Unsafe design of retrofit cantilever balconies
A structural assessment of a number of new balconies being added to an existing building revealed critical concerns in respect of fixings back into the existing brickwork.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1128
Region: CROSS-UK
Water ingress to cross-laminated timber structural frame
In an eight year old building that included cross-laminated timber construction, it was found that water penetration had caused parts of the structure to rot.
6 June 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1124
Region: CROSS-UK
Effective lengths of load-bearing walls
A reporter raises concerns about masonry walls that they feel do not comply with the limitations on effective length.
1 July 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 56
Region: CROSS-UK
Low pitched metal sheet roofs
A reporter is concerned about low pitch metal sheet roofing attached to trussed rafters.
1 April 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 66
Region: CROSS-UK