Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (6)
- (-)
Buildings
(89)
- Agricultural buildings (2)
- Car parks (4)
- Commercial (8)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (2)
- Education, science & art buildings (4)
- Health care (1)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (2)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (20)
- Stadiums (3)
- Tall buildings (4)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Floating structures (1)
- Marine structures (1)
- Masts & towers (3)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (2)
- Temporary structures (1)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (11)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (7)
- Conservation & restoration project (2)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (35)
- Extension project (5)
- New build (16)
- Refurbishment (7)
- Remediation project (6)
- Repair project (2)
- Strengthening project (1)
- Structural assessment (13)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (4)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (20)
- Bracing (9)
- Ceilings (1)
- Cladding (6)
- Columns (17)
- Fasteners & connections (24)
- Foundations (2)
- Insulation (2)
- Light gauge steel framing (3)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (3)
- Roofs (17)
- Shear walls (1)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (16)
- Trusses (5)
- Walls (11)
- Wall ties (1)
Temporary works
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Business practice
Public incidents
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (42)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (29)
- CROSS Safety Alert (4)
- CROSS Safety Report (84)
- News [sub-heading only] (10)
- Safety information from CROSS [sub-heading only] (1)
- Safety information [sub-heading only] (1)
- Third party content (1)
- Third party content (1)
CROSS regions
Concern over modelling of concrete frame building for construction stage
Independent check shows inadequate modelling of concrete frame building with transfer slab.
10 March 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1073
Region: CROSS-UK
Unsafe design of retrofit cantilever balconies
A structural assessment of a number of new balconies being added to an existing building revealed critical concerns in respect of fixings back into the existing brickwork.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1128
Region: CROSS-UK
Misleading instructions for a structural component
A reporter confirms the difficulty encountered whilst endeavouring to ensure cast-in insulated connectors supporting a parapet wall and balustrade were properly fixed.
26 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1127
Region: CROSS-UK
Incorrect modelling of a cantilever
A steel framed building was incorrectly modelled and designed resulting in excessive deflection of part of the frame even before the frame was loaded with the self-weight of the building.
17 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1144
Region: CROSS-UK
Further example of incorrect finite element modelling
Concerns in respect of the sufficiency of finite element modelling of masonry walls as part of a reinforced concrete framed building.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1145
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate design for basement works
An inadequate structural design for alterations to a basement led to structural distress within a substantial five-storey townhouse.
21 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1132
Region: CROSS-UK
Connection fixity considerations for steel frame modelling
This report concerns the modelling of joints when using computer programs. In some cases, engineers are applying rotational releases to joints in models but subsequently designing the connections as rigid. This leaves a fundamental mismatch between analysis and design which may lead to unsafe structural connections argues a reporter.
17 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1139
Region: CROSS-UK
Construction period of RAAC planks
A reporter says that there are structural issues with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) panels installed in a building as late as 1998. This date is significantly later than previous reports suggest as the last significant use of RAAC elements in the UK.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 954
Region: CROSS-UK
Steel column erection anchoring connection failure injured worker
This report describes how a construction worker was injured during the erection of a steel column due to shortcomings in erection procedures and inadequacies in a column base connection.
10 May 2021
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 992
Region: CROSS-US
Change in use results in masonry wall failure
A room with walls of traditional cavity and single skin masonry was lined with plywood and used for storage of wood chips. No thought was given to the lateral pressure on the walls which eventually failed.
6 April 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 884
Region: CROSS-UK