Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Structural form
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (6)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- (-) CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (63)
- CROSS Newsletter (37)
- CROSS Safety Report (63)
- News [sub-heading only] (11)
CROSS regions
Retaining wall concerns and the stance of a local authority
A reporter was asked by a client to assess a retaining wall built on their boundary by a neighbour who had erected a new dwelling. A review of the calculations and a typical section gave serious concern for its strength.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 189
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Split responsibilities on temporary bracing of steelwork
A contractor removed temporary bracing on site prior to the structure being in a permanent stable state.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 204
Region: CROSS-UK
Structural assessments of multi-storey car parks
The parking industry has in recent years (2012) seen several MSCPs closed due to structural fears, says a reporter, which begs the question how close were they to structural failure before they were taken out of service?
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 224
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of tank falsework
This report relates to the collapse of falsework erected to construct an in situ, reinforced concrete, circular water retaining structure.
1 October 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 150
Region: CROSS-UK
Thermal effects on long span concrete car park beams
A reporter describes how long span precast hollow core units in a car park started to bow upwards due to thermal effects.
1 October 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 173
Region: CROSS-UK
Multi-storey car parks demolished due to structural defects
A reporter shares their experience on two instances where their firm has prepared reports and carried out numerical assessments of city centre car parks that have led to the car parks being demolished.
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 267
Region: CROSS-UK
Asymmetric bridge design and construction – a near miss
During the construction stage of an arch footbridge a design error was identified that had been indirectly revealed by an associated error in construction.
1 October 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 262
Region: CROSS-UK
Multi-storey car parks - structural condition concerns
A reporter raises concerns about the structural condition of a number of car parks that they have worked on as remediation projects.
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 265
Region: CROSS-UK
Effect of staff change on a design
A reporter illustrates how risk can be generated from staff turnover.
1 October 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 277
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.