Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (13)
- Buildings
(65)
- Agricultural buildings (6)
- Commercial (7)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (1)
- Education, science & art buildings (3)
- Health care (1)
- Industrial buildings (3)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (3)
- Recreational buildings (3)
- Residential (16)
- Stadiums (2)
- Storage buildings (3)
- Tall buildings (3)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Car parks (1)
- Flats & apartments (5)
- Houses (4)
- Masts & towers (3)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (4)
- Roads (1)
- Temporary structures (4)
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (7)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (3)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (39)
- Excavation (3)
- Extension project (5)
- New build (21)
- Refurbishment (5)
- Remediation project (3)
- Repair project (1)
- Strengthening project (1)
- Structural assessment (5)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (3)
- Balustrades (3)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (29)
- Bracing (6)
- Cables (1)
- Ceilings (2)
- Cladding (4)
- Columns (14)
- Fasteners & connections (39)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (2)
- Insulation (2)
- Light gauge steel framing (6)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (3)
- PV panels (1)
- Roofs (8)
- Shear walls (1)
- Slabs (5)
- Trusses (2)
- Walls (10)
- Wall ties (1)
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 23 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 27 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 61 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (53)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (43)
- CROSS Safety Alert (1)
- CROSS Safety Report (96)
- News [sub-heading only] (17)
CROSS regions
Possible galvanising concern
A reporter has a question about using galvanised steel poles for the members of dome structures.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 48
Region: CROSS-UK
Liquid metal assisted cracking (LMAC)
A reporter raises concerns about the risk of liquid metal assisted cracking during the hot dip galvanising process.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 45
Region: CROSS-UK
Design of head track in cold formed steel framing
The reporter noticed that the in-house structural engineer for the steel frame company had not taken account of all the loads in the design of the head track.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 39
Region: CROSS-UK
Steelwork connection design
A reporter was asked to design connections for a multi-storey building for which the frame had been designed by another engineer. The result was a near collapse situation.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 25
Region: CROSS-UK
Girder collapse
The failure was of a two-storey high trussed girder with a 36m span, designed to carry a composite steel and concrete floor at the lower level and a trussed roof at higher level.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 30
Region: CROSS-UK
Grades of steelwork
A reporter says that engineers seem reluctant to specify the grade of steel. Even when prompted, some fail to request anything other than just S275 – failing to mention JR, J0, or other grades.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 43
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns over structural design submissions
Concern was expressed about the standard of structural design submissions presented to local authorities.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 14
Region: CROSS-UK
Proper design and use of cold rolled steel frames
A reporter has been designing structures in cold rolled steel for approximately twenty years, mainly portal frame buildings, and some concerns.
1 January 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 93
Region: CROSS-UK
Freezing splits galvanised SHS columns
Concerns were raised after several square hollow section members split vertically on a partially complete construction site.
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 253
Region: CROSS-UK
Snow loading in Scotland - summary of reports
There were heavy snowfalls over the entire United Kingdom in the winters of 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 and CROSS received a number of reports, mostly from Scotland where a significant number of buildings suffered roof collapses.
1 July 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 264
Region: CROSS-UK