Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (14)
- Buildings
(77)
- Agricultural buildings (2)
- Commercial (6)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (2)
- Education, science & art buildings (1)
- Higher-risk buildings (2)
- Industrial buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (3)
- Recreational buildings (3)
- Residential (25)
- Storage buildings (1)
- Tall buildings (4)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Buried pipes & culverts (1)
- Car parks (2)
- Flats & apartments (7)
- Floating structures (1)
- Hotels & hostels (1)
- Houses (10)
- Marine structures (1)
- Masts & towers (4)
- Railways (3)
- Reservoirs & dams (1)
- Retaining structures (5)
- Roads (2)
- Sewers (2)
- Temporary structures (5)
- Tunnels (1)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (19)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- (-) Construction project [sub-heading only] (103)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (4)
- Extension project (11)
- Groundworks project (1)
- Maintenance project (3)
- New build (42)
- Refurbishment (12)
- Remediation project (11)
- Repair project (5)
- Strengthening project (3)
- Structural assessment (4)
- Underpinning project (2)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Arch (2)
- Balconies (2)
- Balustrades (4)
- Basements (4)
- Beams (22)
- Bracing (7)
- Ceilings (2)
- Cladding (11)
- Columns (15)
- Fasteners & connections (32)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (9)
- Insulation (3)
- Light gauge steel framing (4)
- Padstones (1)
- Parapets (2)
- PV panels (1)
- Roofs (9)
- Sandwich panels (1)
- Shear walls (2)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (13)
- Trusses (3)
- Walls (15)
- Wall ties (2)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Theme pages
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (2)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (4)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (49)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (2)
- CROSS Newsletter (36)
- CROSS Safety Report (103)
- News [sub-heading only] (13)
CROSS regions
Timber truss
The reporter has been dealing with an application where the engineer involved discovered proprietary timber girder trusses with some glued joints that have come loose.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 62
Region: CROSS-UK
Steelwork connection design
A reporter was asked to design connections for a multi-storey building for which the frame had been designed by another engineer. The result was a near collapse situation.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 25
Region: CROSS-UK
Mobile phone masts
The concern of an overseas reporter is that erection, foundation design and construction, and maintenance of mobile phone masts are not carried out adequately.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 22
Region: CROSS-UK
Girder collapse
The failure was of a two-storey high trussed girder with a 36m span, designed to carry a composite steel and concrete floor at the lower level and a trussed roof at higher level.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 30
Region: CROSS-UK
Building Regulations submission for a small house
A reporter who is a small builder shares their experience on inadequate design calculations they received for a small house.
1 January 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 91
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of tank falsework
This report relates to the collapse of falsework erected to construct an in situ, reinforced concrete, circular water retaining structure.
1 October 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 150
Region: CROSS-UK
'Design' for alterations to a dwelling carried out by an unsuitable person
A reporter was called upon to review a design for the removal of a loadbearing wall during the refurbishment of a residence. A builder was already on site but had stopped work since they considered the engineering design to be unsatisfactory and the structural designer was not responding to their queries. The reporter found that the structural design being followed was far from competent.
21 August 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1236
Region: CROSS-UK
Learning from historic failures
This report is not to discuss or preempt the findings of the investigation but to draw attention to historical failures where ground conditions have been highlighted in subsequent Health and Safety Executive (HSE) reports on the incidents.
1 January 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 154
Region: CROSS-UK
Effect of staff change on a design
A reporter illustrates how risk can be generated from staff turnover.
1 October 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 277
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns with propping design to large excavations
Concerns are raised about the design of propping to large excavations and particularly about the design of the connections for a raking prop to a horizontal waler.
1 January 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 298
Region: CROSS-UK