Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Project type
Method of construction
Structural form
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 23 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (17)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (2)
- CROSS Newsletter (13)
- CROSS Safety Report (43)
- News [sub-heading only] (6)
CROSS regions
Sudden hole in piling mat - update
This is further information about report 566 which highlighted how a sudden hole appeared in a piling mat.
1 October 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 596
Region: CROSS-UK
Failure of supposedly grade 10.9 bolts
There was a high potential for collapse when supposedly grade 10.9 high strength holding bolts failed on a crane base.
1 October 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 585
Region: CROSS-UK
Settlement of driven piles
A railway platform was constructed on piled foundations and it was noticed that one pair of piles and their associated cross head settled soon afterwards.
1 April 2017
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 607
Region: CROSS-UK
Failure of tower crane studs
This report describes how non-standard Grade 10.9 studs used to connect a tower crane mast to a steel grillage failed.
1 January 2017
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 600
Region: CROSS-UK
Error in proprietary design program
It has been noted, says a reporter, that a current package for pad foundation design has no factor of safety against overturning, returning a ‘pass’ for unfactored loads and a utilisation ratio of 1.
1 July 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 349
Region: CROSS-UK
Tower crane foundation design error
Whilst carrying out an independent design check on a tower crane foundation design, a reporter discovered that the piles used on site did not have the required tension capacity.
1 July 2018
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 662
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns over unreinforced lighting column foundation
Concerns were raised on a major highway project after it was noticed that the contractor was casting a pad foundation with no reinforcement in the base.
1 July 2017
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 652
Region: CROSS-UK
Failure of pile load test arrangement
A pile was being load-tested, for confirmation of design pile loads for the foundations of a road bridge, when the web of the deep steel beam used in the testing arrangement buckled.
1 January 2015
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 484
Region: CROSS-UK
Insufficient attention to the construction of tower crane bases
While working on construction sites a reporter was involved with tower crane bases supported on piles with pile caps and pedestals with cast-in anchors that had significant construction defects.
1 August 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 920
Region: CROSS-AUS
Crane outrigger loads underestimated due to misuse of software
A reporter is concerned about how the misuse of software can lead to incorrect outrigger loads being used in the design of foundations for crane outriggers.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 915
Region: CROSS-UK