Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (6)
- (-)
Buildings
(89)
- Agricultural buildings (2)
- Car parks (4)
- Commercial (8)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (2)
- Education, science & art buildings (4)
- Health care (1)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (2)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (20)
- Stadiums (3)
- Tall buildings (4)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Floating structures (1)
- Marine structures (1)
- Masts & towers (3)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (2)
- Temporary structures (1)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (11)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (7)
- Conservation & restoration project (2)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (35)
- Extension project (5)
- New build (16)
- Refurbishment (7)
- Remediation project (6)
- Repair project (2)
- Strengthening project (1)
- Structural assessment (13)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (4)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (20)
- Bracing (9)
- Ceilings (1)
- Cladding (6)
- Columns (17)
- Fasteners & connections (24)
- Foundations (2)
- Insulation (2)
- Light gauge steel framing (3)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (3)
- Roofs (17)
- Shear walls (1)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (16)
- Trusses (5)
- Walls (11)
- Wall ties (1)
Temporary works
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Business practice
Public incidents
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (42)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (29)
- CROSS Safety Alert (4)
- CROSS Safety Report (84)
- News [sub-heading only] (10)
- Safety information from CROSS [sub-heading only] (1)
- Safety information [sub-heading only] (1)
- Third party content (1)
- Third party content (1)
CROSS regions
Connection fixity considerations for steel frame modelling
This report concerns the modelling of joints when using computer programs. In some cases, engineers are applying rotational releases to joints in models but subsequently designing the connections as rigid. This leaves a fundamental mismatch between analysis and design which may lead to unsafe structural connections argues a reporter.
17 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1139
Region: CROSS-UK
Incorrect modelling of a cantilever
A steel framed building was incorrectly modelled and designed resulting in excessive deflection of part of the frame even before the frame was loaded with the self-weight of the building.
17 November 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1144
Region: CROSS-UK
Further example of incorrect finite element modelling
Concerns in respect of the sufficiency of finite element modelling of masonry walls as part of a reinforced concrete framed building.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1145
Region: CROSS-UK
Hazard identification for structural design
At the outset of the design, it is recommended that the structural engineer should document the proposed structural design philosophy and the approach to design against disproportionate collapse and agree this with the client.
1 September 2017
CROSS Safety Alert
Region: CROSS-UK, CROSS-AUS, CROSS-US
'Design' for alterations to a dwelling carried out by an unsuitable person
A reporter was called upon to review a design for the removal of a loadbearing wall during the refurbishment of a residence. A builder was already on site but had stopped work since they considered the engineering design to be unsatisfactory and the structural designer was not responding to their queries. The reporter found that the structural design being followed was far from competent.
21 August 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1236
Region: CROSS-UK
RAAC planks in a 1970s shopping centre
An existing large shopping centre built circa 1975 had a number of external storerooms and loading bays with roofs constructed using reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) planks. The planks had deflected to the extent that they needed replacing.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1155
Region: CROSS-UK
Permanent formwork to slabs
Concerns are raised over deflection issues that are not being considered when using permanent formwork.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 215
Region: CROSS-UK
Structural assessments of multi-storey car parks
The parking industry has in recent years (2012) seen several MSCPs closed due to structural fears, says a reporter, which begs the question how close were they to structural failure before they were taken out of service?
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 224
Region: CROSS-UK
Litigation on divided responsibilities
Divided design responsibilities, says a reporter, are a common source of litigation.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 229
Region: CROSS-UK
Design of tall asymmetric structures
A reporter touches on the topic of analysis and design of the structural systems for tall buildings which are asymmetric and may be irregular in plan.
1 April 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 238
Region: CROSS-UK