Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (7)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (39)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (1)
- Extension project (4)
- New build (28)
- Refurbishment (3)
- Remediation project (3)
- Strengthening project (1)
- Structural assessment (1)
- Underpinning project (2)
Method of construction
Structural form
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (36)
- CROSS Newsletter (20)
- CROSS Safety Report (52)
- News [sub-heading only] (8)
CROSS regions
Inadequate foundation reinforcement
Subcontractors carrying out the ground works for a multi-storey development failed to provide sufficient continuity reinforcement in the ground beams.
1 October 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 112
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate chimney support
The supports for a domestic chimney had been removed which left a 2.5m high chimney stack almost unsupported and in a potentially dangerous state.
1 April 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 131
Region: CROSS-UK
Temporary works propping
A reporter raises concerns about the adequacy of temporary works that were installed on site during the refurbishing of a large office building.
1 January 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 146
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns on stability require prompt action
A reporter was concerned about overall building stability during an extension and conversion project.
1 January 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 171
Region: CROSS-UK
Dangerous modification to a column
A reporter was requested to visit a warehouse to inspect work carried out to a main support column that had been modified by a builder.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 169
Region: CROSS-UK
Safety issues with composite metal deck floors
A contractor had a near miss when pouring a concrete slab with permanent formwork.
1 January 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 288
Region: CROSS-UK
Effect of staff change on a design
A reporter illustrates how risk can be generated from staff turnover.
1 October 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 277
Region: CROSS-UK
Lack of experience on steel column erection
A reporter highlights how works progressed on site without a detailed method statement being provided by the contractor even though it had been requested.
1 April 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 324
Region: CROSS-UK
Missing rebar identified prior to concrete slab pour
A reporter describes how they often encounter issues such as missing reinforcement while carrying out pre-pour inspections.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 310
Region: CROSS-UK
Stability compromised in school hall
A reporter highlights construction issues that occurred during the construction of a new school hall.
1 January 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 242
Region: CROSS-UK