Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Products
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (12)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (25)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (1)
- Extension project (6)
- New build (8)
- Refurbishment (2)
- Remediation project (4)
- Repair project (1)
- Structural assessment (1)
- Underpinning project (2)
Method of construction
Structural form
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Risk management
Theme pages
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (21)
- CROSS Newsletter (9)
- CROSS Safety Report (30)
- News [sub-heading only] (3)
CROSS regions
Risk in notching timber studs
During the construction of a block of apartments a reporter found a couple of locations on an external fourth floor wall where the load-bearing studs had been notched well past permissible depths.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 209
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
House collapse
This is a case of collapse caused by a builder not carrying out underpinning works as detailed by the design engineer.
1 January 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 128
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate underpinning
Works were stopped on site after it was discovered the contractor had completely ignored the specified 5-bay sequence and timing of the underpinning works shown on the design drawings.
1 April 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 72
Region: CROSS-UK
Wind damage to gable wall
Following request for examples of wind damage this collapse was reported of the external brick skin of gable wall of a two storey timber frame terraced house.
1 April 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 78
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of a gable wall
Part of a gable wall to a fairly recently constructed block of flats collapsed onto a parked car which suffered significant damage.
1 April 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 92
Region: CROSS-UK
Shop/domestic building collapse
A two storey corner (end of terrace) property fronting a very busy, narrow major route collapsed during the construction of a new basement.
1 January 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 123
Region: CROSS-UK
Advice wanted by amateur builder
This notice, seen by a reporter, was posted on a DIY website, and whilst it may be apocryphal, it illustrates the type of queries received by local authorities and building regulations officers.
1 January 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 125
Region: CROSS-UK
Stability of terraced buildings
A reporter is concerned about a terrace of four buildings the third of which is being opened up.
1 April 2015
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 448
Region: CROSS-UK
Unauthorised alterations to Light Gauge Steel Framing on site
Concerns were raised after Light Gauge Steel Framing (LGSF) acting as a structural system was trimmed locally on site to accommodate the installation of balcony brackets without approval from the design team.
1 July 2018
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 669
Region: CROSS-UK