Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Buildings
(141)
- Agricultural buildings (2)
- Car parks (2)
- Commercial (16)
- Education, science & art buildings (11)
- Health care (11)
- Higher-risk buildings (6)
- Industrial buildings (5)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- LPS buildings (2)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (4)
- (-) Residential (143)
- Stadiums (1)
- Tall buildings (12)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (2)
- Transport buildings (2)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (2)
- Temporary structures (1)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (25)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (3)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (58)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (3)
- Extension project (14)
- Fire safety assessment (1)
- Maintenance project (2)
- New build (27)
- Refurbishment (9)
- Remediation project (9)
- Repair project (3)
- Strengthening project (2)
- Structural assessment (4)
- Underpinning project (3)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (9)
- Balustrades (6)
- Basements (4)
- Beams (21)
- Bracing (5)
- Canopies (2)
- Ceilings (1)
- Cladding (7)
- Columns (9)
- Fasteners & connections (18)
- Fire protection (5)
- Foundations (2)
- Insulation (4)
- Light gauge steel framing (3)
- Lintels (3)
- Padstones (4)
- PV panels (1)
- Roofs (15)
- Shear walls (1)
- Slabs (6)
- Trusses (2)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (30)
- Wall ties (3)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 23 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 61 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 62 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (5)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (57)
- CROSS Feature Article (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (41)
- CROSS Safety Report (142)
- News [sub-heading only] (10)
CROSS regions
Lack of control on site when underpinning
The concern is in relation to the sequencing of construction and the lack of control on site from competent persons during underpinning works.
1 October 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 241
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Insufficient design fees
A reporter raises concerns over design fees that were below typical market rates.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 190
Region: CROSS-UK
Role of approved inspectors
A reporter whose firm is involved in a partially built project worth £6m, where there is defective work and the builder has gone into liquidation, raises concerns over the role of the approved inspector.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 205
Region: CROSS-UK
Risk in notching timber studs
During the construction of a block of apartments a reporter found a couple of locations on an external fourth floor wall where the load-bearing studs had been notched well past permissible depths.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 209
Region: CROSS-UK
Need for licensed builders
A reporter feels certain building work should only be carried out by licensed qualified builders.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 214
Region: CROSS-UK
Snow loading in Scotland - ice load
A reporter’s practice who specialises in remediation have had new instructions on five roof collapses after a period of heavy snowfalls (January 2010).
1 July 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 184
Region: CROSS-UK
Alterations to existing buildings with no site visits
A reporter is concerned about structural engineers developing structural calculations and drawings based on the Architects’ drawings only, with no site visits.
1 January 2014
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 365
Region: CROSS-UK
Industry not reacting to failures
As legislation is reviewed, this report questions the appetite for change in the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire.
1 July 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 798
Region: CROSS-UK
Retaining wall excavation collapse
A 6m deep excavation formed for constructing a retaining wall on a domestic project collapsed due to insufficient propping.
1 July 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 800
Region: CROSS-UK