Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Structural form
Elements & systems
- Balconies (2)
- Basements (3)
- Beams (13)
- Bracing (3)
- Ceilings (2)
- Cladding (1)
- Columns (9)
- Fasteners & connections (15)
- Fire protection (2)
- Foundations (10)
- Light gauge steel framing (1)
- Lintels (1)
- Padstones (1)
- Parapets (3)
- Roofs (2)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (16)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (16)
- Wall ties (1)
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (2)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 15 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (43)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (27)
- CROSS Safety Report (76)
- News [sub-heading only] (8)
CROSS regions
Accidental partial demolition of a beam
During a site visit, the permanent works design engineer noticed that hydro-demolition of the end of a floor supporting beam had taken place out of sequence. This introduced a pattern of bending moments and shear forces that were not considered in the original design.
6 April 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 855
Region: CROSS-UK
Temporary instability of columns
Concerns were raised by a reporter on the temporary stability of concrete columns during construction.
2 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 872
Region: CROSS-UK
Concern over concrete test methods used on site
A reporter is concerned about the test method a contractor uses to justify the strength of concrete placed on site.
13 December 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 840
Region: CROSS-UK
Roof collapse of warehouse structure under rainwater ponding
This report highlights the structural risk caused by rainwater ponding on relatively flat roofs.
10 May 2021
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 969
Region: CROSS-US
Grouting of joints between load-bearing prefabricated concrete members
This report highlights the risk of failure if grouted joints between load-bearing prefabricated concrete members are not designed and installed correctly.
30 April 2021
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 961
Region: CROSS-AUS
Continuously threaded reinforcing bar
This report highlights the difficulty of inspecting continuously threaded reinforcing bars to ensure that they have been adequately inserted into the cast-in ferrules.
2 August 2022
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1074
Region: CROSS-AUS
Cantilever bridge parapet falsework failure
A reporter has experienced the failure of cantilever parapet falsework twice, for different reasons, using two different products during bridge construction.
20 February 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1159
Region: CROSS-UK
Retaining wall concerns and the stance of a local authority
A reporter was asked by a client to assess a retaining wall built on their boundary by a neighbour who had erected a new dwelling. A review of the calculations and a typical section gave serious concern for its strength.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 189
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Unstable concrete blocks
A reporter from a consulting firm was called to a site where the blocks in a retaining wall were found to be expanding and falling apart.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 174
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.