Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (1)
- (-)
Buildings
(143)
- Agricultural buildings (4)
- Commercial (10)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (3)
- Education, science & art buildings (5)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (3)
- LPS buildings (3)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (2)
- Residential (41)
- Stadiums (2)
- Storage buildings (3)
- Tall buildings (8)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Car parks (7)
- Flats & apartments (10)
- Hotels & hostels (1)
- Houses (21)
- Masts & towers (1)
- Retaining structures (2)
- Temporary structures (2)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
- BIM (1)
- Computational design (1)
- Design: quality management (23)
- Design calculations (29)
- Design conceptualisation (2)
- Design detailing (27)
- Design drawings (10)
- Design loads (31)
- Design software (11)
- Dynamics (3)
- Fire safety design (4)
- Resilience (6)
- Robustness (15)
- Structural design (28)
- Sustainability (2)
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (14)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (7)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (71)
- Demolition project (4)
- Excavation (3)
- Extension project (9)
- Fire safety assessment (1)
- Maintenance project (1)
- New build (34)
- Refurbishment (3)
- Remediation project (2)
- Strengthening project (2)
- Structural assessment (6)
- Underpinning project (3)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (5)
- Basements (6)
- Beams (21)
- Bracing (7)
- Canopies (2)
- Ceilings (2)
- Cladding (5)
- Columns (13)
- Fasteners & connections (28)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (5)
- Insulation (1)
- Lintels (1)
- Padstones (1)
- Parapets (2)
- Roofs (21)
- Shear walls (1)
- Slabs (12)
- Trusses (2)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (23)
- Wall ties (4)
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 23 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (114)
- CROSS Newsletter (62)
- CROSS Safety Report (143)
- News [sub-heading only] (21)
- Safety information from CROSS [sub-heading only] (1)
CROSS regions
Heritage balustrade complying with current regulations
A reporter is hoping that CROSS might be able to help with some research for a heritage project.
1 January 2017
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 599
Region: CROSS-UK
Incorrectly designed safety system
A reporter raises concerns about the way in which the structure for a safety system had been modelled using an inappropriate software package.
1 January 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 527
Region: CROSS-UK
PV panels on domestic roof
A reporter raises concerns as they suspect PV panels are being erected on domestic (and commercial) roofs across the UK without adequate engineering analysis and design.
1 October 2015
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 528
Region: CROSS-UK
PV panels blown off roof
Concerns are raised about the adequacy of fixings for PV panels after panels were blown off of a flat roof.
1 October 2015
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 519
Region: CROSS-UK
Failure to check designs produced by software
Concerns were raised about a proprietary design software after a building control officer noticed a regular error appearing while checking calculations provided to them.
1 January 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 538
Region: CROSS-UK
Local wind effects at high level
A reporter shares their experience on the wind speeds they encountered when carrying out high level works on a city centre building.
1 July 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 548
Region: CROSS-UK
Installation of PV panels
A reporter's firm believes an oversaturated market of engineers carrying out assessments has drove the prices for assessments on roof structures accommodating PV panels down.
1 April 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 533
Region: CROSS-UK
Further Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP) concerns
A reporter raises their concerns over the potential safety issue of older car parks that are suffering neglect through lack of inspection and routine maintenance.
1 January 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 127
Region: CROSS-UK
Divided design responsibilities
A reporter raises concerns after overall responsibility on a project appears to have been apportioned out to individual parties rather than having one structural consultant onboard to pull all the various aspects together.
1 October 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 151
Region: CROSS-UK
Unsuitable underpinning
When reviewing a consulting engineer’s proposal to underpin a party wall, the reporter noticed that there was insufficient vertical load to maintain stability under lateral load from the retained height of soil.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 175
Region: CROSS-UK