Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (1)
- Buildings
(12)
- Commercial (3)
- Education, science & art buildings (1)
- Health care (1)
- Industrial buildings (1)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (1)
- Residential (3)
- Stadiums (1)
- Storage buildings (1)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (1)
- Transport buildings (1)
- Flats & apartments (1)
- Railways (1)
- Retaining structures (1)
- Temporary structures (1)
Building height
Products
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Method of construction
Temporary works
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 64 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 68 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (10)
- CROSS Newsletter (5)
- CROSS Safety Report (19)
- News [sub-heading only] (1)
CROSS regions
Retaining wall concerns and the stance of a local authority
A reporter was asked by a client to assess a retaining wall built on their boundary by a neighbour who had erected a new dwelling. A review of the calculations and a typical section gave serious concern for its strength.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 189
Region: CROSS-UK
Design deficiencies in calculations submitted to a Local Authority
A Local Authority Building Control manager has sent a list which gives twenty nine of the more serious design review queries raised by the building control structural checking process over the last five years.
1 October 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 210
Region: CROSS-UK
Concrete grade confusion in software
A reporter noticed that the design calculation report generated by a proprietary software package called for ‘concrete characteristic strength = 45N/mm2’, but did not confirm whether this refers to the cylinder or cube strength.
1 April 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 788
Region: CROSS-UK
Design responsibility for temporary stability of steel frame building
A reporter raises concerns about the division of responsibility for the temporary stability of a four-storey steel frame structure with precast concrete planks and a structural topping.
1 April 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 789
Region: CROSS-UK
Repeating the same design mistakes
A correspondent who investigates engineering failures has shared common errors which engineers keep repeating.
1 October 2019
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 858
Region: CROSS-UK
Computer analysis and slab design twisting moments
A reporter has noticed on many occasions when checking reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab designs that engineers often neglect to consider twisting moments when arriving at slab design moments.
1 October 2014
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 441
Region: CROSS-UK
Crane outrigger loads underestimated due to misuse of software
A reporter is concerned about how the misuse of software can lead to incorrect outrigger loads being used in the design of foundations for crane outriggers.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 915
Region: CROSS-UK
Structural issues with cladding
A reporter who investigates cladding failures shares common issues they have encountered.
1 April 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 904
Region: CROSS-UK
GFRP reinforcement in concrete structures
A correspondent has become aware of work being undertaken in the field of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement as a substitute for steel rebar in concrete structures and is deeply concerned by what they have observed.
1 August 2020
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 939
Region: CROSS-AUS