Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (12)
- Buildings
(84)
- Car parks (1)
- Commercial (4)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (1)
- Education, science & art buildings (7)
- Industrial buildings (2)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (2)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (24)
- Stadiums (1)
- Storage buildings (2)
- Tall buildings (2)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (5)
- Buried pipes & culverts (1)
- Masts & towers (5)
- Railways (4)
- Retaining structures (9)
- Roads (3)
- Sewers (2)
- Temporary structures (3)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Arch (1)
- Balconies (2)
- Balustrades (3)
- Basements (3)
- Beams (22)
- Bracing (7)
- Canopies (1)
- Ceilings (10)
- Cladding (8)
- Columns (11)
- Fasteners & connections (47)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (10)
- Light gauge steel framing (2)
- Lintels (1)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (2)
- Roofs (5)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (8)
- Trusses (1)
- Walls (30)
- Wall ties (5)
- Wind posts (1)
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 1 (2)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 8 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (7)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 15 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 27 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (6)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (5)
- (-) CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (156)
- CROSS Newsletter (82)
- CROSS Safety Report (156)
- News [sub-heading only] (28)
CROSS regions
Steelwork connection design
A reporter was asked to design connections for a multi-storey building for which the frame had been designed by another engineer. The result was a near collapse situation.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 25
Region: CROSS-UK
Steel portal frame erection
A reporter describes how a steel portal frame collapsed during its erection.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 20
Region: CROSS-UK
Mobile phone masts
The concern of an overseas reporter is that erection, foundation design and construction, and maintenance of mobile phone masts are not carried out adequately.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 22
Region: CROSS-UK
Differing reinforcement couplers
On a recent project, because of supply problems, the contractor decided to change from the specified rebar couplers (type ‘A’) to those of another manufacturer (type ‘B’).
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 28
Region: CROSS-UK
Structural steel - reinforced concrete interface
A reporter describes how the substructure of a building was constructed out of position to the extent that the steel frame could not be erected to tolerance and could not be connected to the holding down bolts.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 19
Region: CROSS-UK
Large aluminium dome failure
A structure composed of aluminium tubes failed.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 5
Region: CROSS-UK
Cladding fixed to stainless steel
Cladding panels fixed to a stainless steel supporting angle with stainless steel screws failed.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 7
Region: CROSS-UK
Stud framing with self-tapping screws
A reporter raises concerns about contractors not using the specified screws for constructing metal stud frame walls.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 11
Region: CROSS-UK
Fixings to steelwork
The use of proprietary self tapping screws to fix to materials thicker than 10-12mm is questioned by a reporter.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 44
Region: CROSS-UK
Liquid metal assisted cracking (LMAC)
A reporter raises concerns about the risk of liquid metal assisted cracking during the hot dip galvanising process.
1 November 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 45
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.