Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (10)
- Buildings
(70)
- Car parks (6)
- Commercial (4)
- Education, science & art buildings (3)
- Health care (1)
- Industrial buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (3)
- Residential (15)
- Storage buildings (1)
- Tall buildings (2)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (3)
- Transport buildings (2)
- Buried pipes & culverts (1)
- Freestanding walls (1)
- Masts & towers (5)
- Retaining structures (12)
- Roads (3)
- Sewers (2)
- Temporary structures (13)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (6)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (52)
- Demolition project (1)
- Excavation (9)
- New build (25)
- Refurbishment (3)
- Remediation project (5)
- Repair project (3)
- Structural assessment (2)
- Underpinning project (1)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Arch (2)
- Balconies (3)
- Balustrades (4)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (13)
- Bracing (4)
- Canopies (1)
- Ceilings (8)
- Cladding (8)
- Columns (2)
- Fasteners & connections (43)
- Foundations (7)
- Insulation (1)
- Lintels (1)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (1)
- Roofs (11)
- Signs (2)
- Slabs (15)
- Tendons (1)
- Trusses (2)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (26)
- Wall ties (3)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Public incidents
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 8 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 11 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 14 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 15 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 20 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 25 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 27 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 33 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (6)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (102)
- CROSS Newsletter (55)
- CROSS Safety Report (133)
- News [sub-heading only] (21)
CROSS regions
Retaining wall concerns and the stance of a local authority
A reporter was asked by a client to assess a retaining wall built on their boundary by a neighbour who had erected a new dwelling. A review of the calculations and a typical section gave serious concern for its strength.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 189
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Loading reinforced masonry wall
A 2.5m high retaining wall showed signs of movement not long after backfilling, and it was found that the deflection was due to creep in the bed joints of the immature wall.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 178
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of recently installed suspended ceiling
Bingo players had a narrow escape when the ceiling of the hall in which they were playing collapsed.
1 July 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 203
Region: CROSS-UK
Deficiencies on access scaffold
Investigation by a reporter’s firm into an access scaffold on a refurbishment contract on a city centre site brought to light a number of deficiencies which rendered the scaffold out with its design parameters.
1 April 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 219
Region: CROSS-UK
Concern about bridge hangers
A reporter is concerned that a failure in recent years involving the cast connections at each end of vertical bars, which connected to a bow string arch at one end and to a bridge deck at the other, may be in use elsewhere.
1 July 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 222
Region: CROSS-UK
Defective imported scaffold ties
On a contract where multi lift access scaffolds had been installed for a period of up to 18 months in an exposed coastal location, it was found by a reporter on one of the regular inspections that some of the scaffold ties had failed.
1 April 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 230
Region: CROSS-UK
Failed two storey retaining wall
A two storey high retaining wall adjacent to a house collapsed.
1 October 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 240
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of tank falsework
This report relates to the collapse of falsework erected to construct an in situ, reinforced concrete, circular water retaining structure.
1 October 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 150
Region: CROSS-UK
Temporary bridge jacking
Transport for London (London Rail) reported publically on an incident concerning temporary bridge jacking and permission to reproduce an extract is gratefully acknowledged by CROSS.
1 April 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 142
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.