Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Project or lifecycle stage
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Structural form
Elements & systems
Temporary works
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Risk management
Public incidents
Theme pages
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 6 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 13 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 17 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 24 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 43 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- (-) CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (24)
- CROSS Newsletter (10)
- CROSS Safety Report (24)
- News [sub-heading only] (3)
CROSS regions
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Risk in notching timber studs
During the construction of a block of apartments a reporter found a couple of locations on an external fourth floor wall where the load-bearing studs had been notched well past permissible depths.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 209
Region: CROSS-UK
Need for licensed builders
A reporter feels certain building work should only be carried out by licensed qualified builders.
1 January 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 214
Region: CROSS-UK
Lack of control on site when underpinning
The concern is in relation to the sequencing of construction and the lack of control on site from competent persons during underpinning works.
1 October 2011
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 241
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns on stability require prompt action
A reporter was concerned about overall building stability during an extension and conversion project.
1 January 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 171
Region: CROSS-UK
Concern about faulty self-certification of new installation
A reporter’s client had work done in a domestic property by a specialist contractor who was registered under a self-certification Competent Person’s Scheme (CPS) but the work was faulty.
1 April 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 263
Region: CROSS-UK
Shop/domestic building collapse
A two storey corner (end of terrace) property fronting a very busy, narrow major route collapsed during the construction of a new basement.
1 January 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 123
Region: CROSS-UK
Wind damage to gable wall
Following request for examples of wind damage this collapse was reported of the external brick skin of gable wall of a two storey timber frame terraced house.
1 April 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 78
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate underpinning
Works were stopped on site after it was discovered the contractor had completely ignored the specified 5-bay sequence and timing of the underpinning works shown on the design drawings.
1 April 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 72
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of a gable wall
Part of a gable wall to a fairly recently constructed block of flats collapsed onto a parked car which suffered significant damage.
1 April 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 92
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.