Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
- Bridges (9)
- Buildings
(83)
- Car parks (3)
- Commercial (5)
- Consequence Class 3 buildings (2)
- Education, science & art buildings (5)
- Health care (2)
- Higher-risk buildings (1)
- Industrial buildings (1)
- Laboratory buildings (1)
- Nuclear & energy buildings (1)
- Public, religious & civic buildings (4)
- Recreational buildings (2)
- Residential (25)
- Stadiums (2)
- Storage buildings (3)
- Tall buildings (4)
- Theatres & other entertainment buildings (2)
- Transport buildings (2)
- Masts & towers (4)
- Railways (4)
- Retaining structures (3)
- Roads (2)
- Sewers (1)
- Temporary structures (3)
Materials
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Project type
- Alteration & conversion project (4)
- Assessment project [sub-heading only] (1)
- Conservation & restoration project (1)
- Construction project [sub-heading only] (103)
- Extension project (1)
- (-) New build (115)
- Refurbishment (5)
- Remediation project (6)
- Repair project (1)
- Strengthening project (2)
- Structural assessment (2)
Method of construction
Elements & systems
- Arch (1)
- Balconies (4)
- Balustrades (3)
- Basements (1)
- Beams (30)
- Bracing (7)
- Canopies (1)
- Cladding (6)
- Columns (22)
- Fasteners & connections (30)
- Fire protection (3)
- Foundations (15)
- Insulation (1)
- Light gauge steel framing (4)
- Lintels (2)
- Padstones (2)
- Parapets (1)
- Roofs (6)
- Signs (1)
- Slabs (21)
- Tendons (1)
- Trusses (1)
- Wall head restraints (1)
- Walls (18)
- Wall ties (2)
- Wind posts (1)
Plant & equipment
Utilities
Safety reporting
Organisations
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (4)
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 5 (4)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 26 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 31 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 37 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 40 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 42 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (7)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 61 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 65 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 67 (2)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (69)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-US Newsletter 3 (3)
- CROSS-US [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS Newsletter (56)
- CROSS Safety Report (115)
- News [sub-heading only] (18)
CROSS regions
Collapse of a hollow core unit
This refers to the collapse of one modest span precast hollow core concrete unit and the excessive deflection of others on a building which was under construction.
1 October 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 258
Region: CROSS-UK
Stability compromised in school hall
A reporter highlights construction issues that occurred during the construction of a new school hall.
1 January 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 242
Region: CROSS-UK
Litigation on divided responsibilities
Divided design responsibilities, says a reporter, are a common source of litigation.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 229
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Split responsibilities on temporary bracing of steelwork
A contractor removed temporary bracing on site prior to the structure being in a permanent stable state.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 204
Region: CROSS-UK
Documentation for imported large diameter steel pins
A reporter raises concerns over the possibility that foreign steel with poor, confusing or misleading documentation, is being used on safety critical structures in the UK.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 299
Region: CROSS-UK
Incompetent design of simple steel beams
This report concerns designs for simple steel beams submitted to building control bodies under Part A of the Building Regulations. The reporter, a checking engineer for a building control body, was not able to accept the effective length and restraints assumed in a number of submitted designs. Most originated from individuals who used proprietary structural design computer packages without, i...
24 May 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1183
Region: CROSS-UK
Modern methods of construction and robustness
This report relates to the design of a low rise modular building and the requirement, or otherwise, for positive fixings between the superstructure and the substructure.
24 May 2023
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 1179
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate foundation reinforcement
Subcontractors carrying out the ground works for a multi-storey development failed to provide sufficient continuity reinforcement in the ground beams.
1 October 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 112
Region: CROSS-UK
Aerated concrete slabs
A reporter discusses the failure of precast reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) slabs during construction.
1 October 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 55
Region: CROSS-UK, CROSS-AUS, CROSS-US