Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building height
Project or lifecycle stage
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Structural form
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Risk management
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 4 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 9 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 35 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (18)
- CROSS Newsletter (13)
- CROSS Safety Report (23)
- News [sub-heading only] (2)
CROSS regions
Structural steel - reinforced concrete interface
A reporter describes how the substructure of a building was constructed out of position to the extent that the steel frame could not be erected to tolerance and could not be connected to the holding down bolts.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 19
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of tank falsework
This report relates to the collapse of falsework erected to construct an in situ, reinforced concrete, circular water retaining structure.
1 October 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 150
Region: CROSS-UK
Stability compromised in school hall
A reporter highlights construction issues that occurred during the construction of a new school hall.
1 January 2012
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 242
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Split responsibilities on temporary bracing of steelwork
A contractor removed temporary bracing on site prior to the structure being in a permanent stable state.
1 July 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 204
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate foundation reinforcement
Subcontractors carrying out the ground works for a multi-storey development failed to provide sufficient continuity reinforcement in the ground beams.
1 October 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 112
Region: CROSS-UK
Further demolition collapse
This report is of an incident that occurred recently in a UK city when a floor suffered a structural collapse during the demolition of a reinforced concrete building.
1 January 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 90
Region: CROSS-UK
Composition of new precast concrete blocks
A UK firm has raised concerns over a new large precast concrete block range which seems to use a wide range of secondary recycled aggregates in its mix, including some potentially hazardous waste.
1 July 2014
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 380
Region: CROSS-UK
Poor quality of construction and lack of supervision on a block of flats
Concerns are raised over poor quality construction and a lack of supervision on a residential block of flats.
1 July 2017
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 672
Region: CROSS-UK
Responsibilities for hybrid concrete construction
Concerns are raised after a substantial precast element, weighing over 10t, had been placed in position and used as part of the shuttering for an in-situ pour without it being designed to act as a shutter.
1 October 2016
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 574
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.