Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Building height
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Risk management
Public incidents
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 10 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 12 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 16 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 18 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 19 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 21 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 28 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 29 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 30 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 36 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 47 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 48 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 49 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 51 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 59 (3)
- (-) CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (32)
- CROSS Newsletter (22)
- CROSS Safety Report (32)
- News [sub-heading only] (5)
CROSS regions
Structural steel - reinforced concrete interface
A reporter describes how the substructure of a building was constructed out of position to the extent that the steel frame could not be erected to tolerance and could not be connected to the holding down bolts.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 19
Region: CROSS-UK
Steel portal frame erection
A reporter describes how a steel portal frame collapsed during its erection.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 20
Region: CROSS-UK
Mobile phone masts
The concern of an overseas reporter is that erection, foundation design and construction, and maintenance of mobile phone masts are not carried out adequately.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 22
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of a wall during construction
An internal corridor wall collapsed in a school under construction.
1 April 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 99
Region: CROSS-UK
Inadequate foundation reinforcement
Subcontractors carrying out the ground works for a multi-storey development failed to provide sufficient continuity reinforcement in the ground beams.
1 October 2008
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 112
Region: CROSS-UK
Collapse of tank falsework
This report relates to the collapse of falsework erected to construct an in situ, reinforced concrete, circular water retaining structure.
1 October 2009
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 150
Region: CROSS-UK
Documentation for imported large diameter steel pins
A reporter raises concerns over the possibility that foreign steel with poor, confusing or misleading documentation, is being used on safety critical structures in the UK.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 299
Region: CROSS-UK
Lack of experience on steel column erection
A reporter highlights how works progressed on site without a detailed method statement being provided by the contractor even though it had been requested.
1 April 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 324
Region: CROSS-UK
Gain in strength of mortar slower than concrete
A masonry wall settled and cracked after four courses of Engineering grade B bricks were substituted (not by the designer) for the original in-situ concrete padstones on cost and handling grounds.
1 April 2010
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 177
Region: CROSS-UK
Litigation on divided responsibilities
Divided design responsibilities, says a reporter, are a common source of litigation.
1 January 2013
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 229
Region: CROSS-UK
Submit a report
Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.
Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.