Safety information search results
Filter your results
Building or structure type
Project or lifecycle stage
Design
Operation or occupation
Codes, standards & regulations
Fire incident response
Construction period
Method of construction
Elements & systems
Plant & equipment
Weather & natural hazards
Utilities
Safety reporting
Project delivery methods
Business practice
Theme pages
Locations
Content type
- CROSS-AUS Newsletter 1 (1)
- CROSS-AUS [sub-heading only] (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 1 (15)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 2 (9)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 3 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 4 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 5 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 7 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 22 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 32 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 34 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 38 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 39 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 41 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 44 (5)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 45 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 46 (3)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 50 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 52 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 53 (1)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 54 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 55 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 56 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 57 (4)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 58 (2)
- CROSS-UK Newsletter 60 (1)
- CROSS-UK [sub-heading only] (73)
- CROSS Newsletter (26)
- (-) CROSS Safety Report (75)
- (-) News [sub-heading only] (75)
CROSS regions
Differing reinforcement couplers
On a recent project, because of supply problems, the contractor decided to change from the specified rebar couplers (type ‘A’) to those of another manufacturer (type ‘B’).
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 28
Region: CROSS-UK
Girder collapse
The failure was of a two-storey high trussed girder with a 36m span, designed to carry a composite steel and concrete floor at the lower level and a trussed roof at higher level.
1 March 2006
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 30
Region: CROSS-UK
Grades of steelwork
A reporter says that engineers seem reluctant to specify the grade of steel. Even when prompted, some fail to request anything other than just S275 – failing to mention JR, J0, or other grades.
1 February 2007
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 43
Region: CROSS-UK
Potential overload on buildings
A reporter raises concerns after a crowd in a city centre greeting a successful sporting team gained access to the roofs of buildings and were densely packed around perimeters overlooking the streets.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 2
Region: CROSS-UK
Concerns over structural design submissions
Concern was expressed about the standard of structural design submissions presented to local authorities.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 14
Region: CROSS-UK
Local authority resources to check structural calculations
An aspect of local authority work that caused concern to a reporter was the lack of internal resources to check calculations.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 15
Region: CROSS-UK
Roof overloading
A flat roof with parapets and internal downpipes collapsed after drainage outlets became blocked.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 9
Region: CROSS-UK
Computer aided design
Concerns are raises after it was discovered that the steel design element of a software package did not automatically allow for nominal moments in the design of columns for simple structures.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 10
Region: CROSS-UK
Steel fabrication - quality control
A question was raised concerning the quality of some steelwork and the issue of self-certification by the fabricator.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 4
Region: CROSS-UK
Large aluminium dome failure
A structure composed of aluminium tubes failed.
1 November 2005
CROSS Safety Report
Report ID: 5
Region: CROSS-UK