Skip to main content

CROSS Safety Report

Light steel truss issues

Report ID: 817 Published: 1 February 2020 Region: CROSS-AUS

This report is over 2 years old

Please be aware that it might contain information that is no longer up to date. We keep all reports available for historic reference and as learning aids.


A reporter believes that greater awareness is needed of deficiencies in the light steel truss industry (trusses made from cold-formed steel sections).

This report draws attention to poor design and/or fabrication practices relating to connections in light steel trusses, limitations in software when dealing with eccentric loads, and potential problems when scaling up design from low-rise to medium-rise buildings.

Key Learning Outcomes

For structural and civil engineers:

  • Awareness of potential fabrication issues with light steel members used to form trusses

  • Awareness of limitations of design software when dealing with eccentric loads

For contractors:

  • Need to have designs for connections in light steel trusses checked by a competent structural engineer before fabrication, particularly where members are to be cropped short of their connection points

Full Report

Find out more about the Full Report

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others. If you would like to know more, please visit the reporting to CROSS-AUS page. 

A reporter believes that we need to raise awareness of some deficiencies in the light steel truss industry (trusses made from cold-formed steel sections). The reporter's experience is that the deficiencies are representative of some fabricators but not all of them.

Design and software short-comings

Figure 1 shows a connection where the members have been cropped well beyond the connection point. Figure 2 shows another example of the fabrication of trusses resulting in an eccentric load pattern. According to the reporter, there are limitations with some software packages that are commonly used to design light steel trusses in that they do not allow for non-concentric loading of members as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1: members cropped beyond the connection point
Figure 2: eccentric connection

Another example of non-concentric loading noted by the reporter is when the top chord of a truss is stiffened by the fabricator doubling up, or boxing, the member with an additional member fastened alongside the top chord. While the software output may give the number of fasteners required, it does not indicate a connection technique/arrangement.

Lack of guidance on eccentric load paths

According to the reporter, AS4600 (Cold-formed steel structures) does not provide any guidance on eccentric truss load paths and the only option for industry is to design to the North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing, AISI S240-2015. However, in this instance, the reporter notes that eccentricity appears to have been ignored in the design and that there is a disconnect between the software, the fabricator and the certifying engineer. The reporter suggests that a simple solution could be to make certifying engineers more aware of the limitations of some of the software packages being used. The reporter has seen many certifying engineers rely solely on the fabricator to input support locations correctly into the software and has seen this performed poorly by the fabricator.

Need for thorough review of light steel truss designs

The reporter believes it is unlikely that there are many issues in the domestic market where truss design is simpler with smaller spans. However, the reporter is aware that light steel trusses are being increasingly used in the commercial/refurbishment market and would recommend that all engineers thoroughly review light steel truss designs for any structure, paying close attention to any areas requiring transfers, boxed members or additional connections.

Expert Panel Comments

Find out more about the Expert Panel

An Expert Panel comment on the reports we receive. They use their experience to help you understand what can be learned from the reports. If you would like to know more, please visit the CROSS-AUS Expert Panel page.

According to the Australian Steel Institute (ASI) the use of cold-formed light gauge steel is a growth area in Australia. Our country arguably leads the world in the development and manufacturing of leading-edge, cost-effective, high-performance roofing and walling systems.

The ASI further notes that there is increasing use of cold-formed light gauge steel  in mid-rise construction and gives examples of some  recent developments of mid-rise (up to 7–8 storeys) commercial and residential buildings with cold-formed light gauge steel used for the majority of the primary structural framing.

However, most of the technical information available in Australia relates to low-rise residential construction from organisations such as the National Association of Steel-Framed Housing (NASH).

Poor design and/or fabrication of connections

The reporter highlights several issues that can arise with this form of construction and one could add fastener edge distances for tension members and potential buckling at the cropped ends of compression members. As eccentric connections are common with these types of trusses, it is surprising that available software does not take this into account.

Warning: Effects of scaling without understanding implications

This would appear to be another example of the effects of scale as highlighted in SCOSS Alert of November 2018, where we take a system that is well established at one level (in this case low-rise residential), and extend it to another level that requires a more fundamental re-appraisal of the application in terms of the design, fabrication and construction.

Software limitations

A further matter raised by the reporter is that the software being used may not give the complete picture. Concerns with software generally have previously been expressed to CROSS and engineers must always be aware that it is they, and not the software, who are responsible for any subsequent problems. Software cannot replace engineering judgement and working from first principles.

Submit a report

Your report will make a difference. It will help to create positive change and improve safety.

Our secure and confidential safety reporting system gives professionals the opportunity to share their experiences to help others.